Writing Scientific Reports in English (3op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

After completing the course students have achieved the following skills realistic evaluation of one’s own language (English) learning skills, accessing information from a wide range of sources, critical evaluation of information and competence in scientific reporting.

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

The students will practice producing reports which are logically structured, cover sufficient and relevant content, include appropriately labelled graphics, follow the norms for referencing and lay-out, and are written in clear and accurate English.

The students will develop their skills in summarising, paraphrasing and synthesise source materials.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)

The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (Opintojakso)

Student's English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently, source materials are adequately paraphrased.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (Opintojakso)

Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased.

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

Submit the scientific report by 10 October.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Participation in exercises in class and sudmitting given tasks.
Scientifi paper

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Classes on campus
Written and collaborative exercises
Scientific report

Oppimateriaalit

Material will be provided on Moodle.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Approximate work load 81 hours (3 credit points). Active participation in class and independent exercises.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

-

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student's English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently, source materials are adequately paraphrased.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased.