Systematic Review in Health Research (5 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

The student
• is familiar with process containing systematic review method and is able to apply the knowledge in the study
• is able to critically evaluate the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

• Systematic review process
• Search strategy
• Quality appraisal of studies
• Data extraction and analysis
• Methodological quality of systematic review

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)

The student
- has basic competence in the process containing systematic review method, but there is lack in his /her ability to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- has deficiencies to evaluate the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (Opintojakso)

The student
- has good competence in the process containing systematic review method and is able to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- is able to evaluate the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (Opintojakso)

The student
- has excellent competence in the process containing systematic review method and is able to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- is able to evaluate critically the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Aika ja paikka

Classroom teaching:
22.9.2021 at 8.30-11.45 am
27.10.2021 at 8.30 am - 15.45 pm
19.11.2021 at 8.30 am - 15.00 pm

NB! Attendance at all days is compulsory

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Lectures, a course assignment on systematic literature review in small groups, work shops

Oppimateriaalit

Glasziou P, Irwing L, Bain C. & Colditz G. 2004. Systematic reviews in healthcare. A practical guide.

Holly C, Salmond S & Saimbert M. 2017. Comprehensive systematic review for advanced practice nursing. Second edition. Springer publishing company. Saatavilla e-kirjana.

Liaw SY, Carpio GAC, Lau Y, Tan SC, Lim WS & Goh PS. 2018. Multiuser virtual worlds in healthcare education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today 65, 136-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.006. Saatavilla e-lehtenä.

Pölkki T, Kanste O, Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kyngäs M. 2012. Järjestelmällisten kirjallisuuskatsausten metodologinen laatu: katsaus kansainvälisiin ja kansallisiin hoitotieteen julkaisuihin vuodelta 2009-2010. Hoitotiede 24, 335-348. Saatavilla e-lehtenä.

Stolt M, Axelin A & Suhonen R (toim) 2016. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Hoitotieteen laitoksen julkaisuja. Tutkimuksia ja raportteja A: 73/2016. Turun yliopisto, Turku.


Information of teaching materials will be completed by the 24th of August

Sisällön jaksotus

Day 1
Introduction to the course and instructions to the course assignment
Introductory lecture to the systematic literature review
Preparing for the systematic literature review in small groups
Instructions on independent working in small groups between day 1 and day 2

Day 2
Introductory lecture to searching studies from databases
Database searching in small groups
Introductory lecture to the quality assessment of studies and to the analysis/synthesis of original data
Instructions on independent working in small groups between day 2 and day 3

Day 3
Seminar: students’ presentations of progress made in their course assignment
Lecture on the evaluation of systematic literature review

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

The course will be carried out as classroom teaching at TAMK. If there will be any changes in Covid-19 situation causing restrictions, all changes will be informed to the students.

This course information will be completed by the 24th of August.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student is not able to meet the criteria mentioned below.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student
- has basic competence in the process containing systematic review method, but there is lack in his /her ability to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- has deficiencies to evaluate the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student
- has good competence in the process containing systematic review method and is able to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- is able to evaluate the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student
- has excellent competence in the process containing systematic review method and is able to apply the knowledge in his / her study
- is able to evaluate critically the credibility and trustworthiness of his/her study