Synergy using the Piñata Method (5op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

The participants can asign problems in the field of circular economy based on their understanding and experience. They can take part in analysing and solving demanding circular economy and risk management problems as a partner in a professional network. The participants are increasingly able to form their personal development goals related to the needed competencies identified. Through this course the participants futher develop their professional knowledge and they can professionally challenge other professionals not necessarily from the same field of expertise.

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

Collection of questions from the students

Open Source Circular Economy
The content will be based on discussions, acquired competences and co-creation process of the participants.

Aika ja paikka

25.1.-9.4.2021

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assessment is based on the process and product of the co-creation process. Student's self reflection is as part of the assessment.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Lectures, group works, Sustainable Business Model Canvas, arranging an on-line seminar. Discussions, peer-learning and facilitated co-creation. Self-reflection.

Oppimateriaalit

Materials in Moodle

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

5 credtis - 135 hrs. Mostly as individual and group work

Sisällön jaksotus

Introductory lectures on 27th Jan and Kick off of group works 28th Jan.
Group work with check points informed in Moodle. Final webinar organised by students on 7th April.

Kansainvälisyys

Through the contacts of the international student group

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has not completed the assignments in accordance with the guidelines given.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the assignments, but the scope and discussion concerning the topic is narrow and superficial. The participation in group assignments, workshops and web discussions is partial and not constructive.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the assignments and has taken into account multiple points of view on the issues showing awareness of their inter-connections. In group assignments, the student has shown openness to the ideas expressed by the other participants, but engagement has varied during the course.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the tasks with obvious dedication. The student has discussed the cases analytically and constructively both in individual assignments and group discussions. The student has shown active interest and engagement throughout the course.