Functional facility design (5 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

Students are able
- to evaluate different kind of functional facility designs
- to choose suitable surface materials for different kind of facilities
- to choose the right maintenance for surface materials
- to evaluate cleaning contracts

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

WHAT is functional facility design?
HOW to choose and maintenance surface materials?
WHY do I have to understand cleaning contracts?

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)

There are some holes in the assignments and satisfactory treatment of the subject with no own opinions and only few sources and fails in the use of them. Presentations done.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (Opintojakso)

The assignments has been done well and there was good treatment of the subject, good sources and some mistakes in the use of them. Only a few own opinions. Good presentations.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (Opintojakso)

The assignments has been done excellently with clear and full treatment of the subject. Excellent sources and handling of them lots of own opinions. Excellent presentations.

Arviointikriteerit, hyväksytty/hylätty (Opintojakso)

Assignments not fulfilled.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assignments passed

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Assignments,net learning

Oppimateriaalit

In the Tabula

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

100% net learning

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

This course is a hop in- hop off course so you can join in and make your own timetable
The aim of this course is to see functional facility design as a part of Hospitality Management
Students are able
- to evaluate different kind of functional facility designs
- to choose suitable surface materials for different kind of facilities
- to choose the right maintenance for surface materials
- to evaluate cleaning contracts

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

There is some holes in the assignments and satisfactory treatment of the subject with no own opinions and only few sources and failes in the use of them. Presentations done.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The assignments has been done well and there is good treatment of the subject, good sources and some failing in the use of them
only a few own opinions. Good presentations.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The assignments has been done excellently with clear and full treatment of the subject.Excellent sources and handling of them
lots of own opinions. Excellent presentations.