Testing, Commissioning and Documentation (5 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

The students learn the significance of testing and commissioning as a part of the product production and delivery to the customer. Learning is closely connected to the practices of the students’ own professional field. The aim is for the students to learn the significance of security, compliance with the requirements and lifecycle thinking as a part of the product delivery.

Content (course unit)

Testing of the product and the used technology in the commission stage.
It is essential to prove using different methods that the product complies with the definition requirements in a reliable, secure and resistant manner. The product also contains its documentation, which consists of the previous documents as well as service and maintenance instructions and testing documentation.
The end result will be a tested, working product.

Exam schedules

ei tenttiä

Assessment methods and criteria

Raportit, Portfoliot, Näytöt, Keskustelut, Vertais- ja itsearviointi

Teaching methods

Projektioppiminen, Tietoiskut, Työpajatyöskentely, Esitelmät

Student workload

Lähtökohtana opiskelijan kokonaistyön mitoitus (27 h/op). Työnteko ja rytmitys on opiskelijavetoista, projektitavoitteen mukaista.

Content scheduling

Projektit etenevät omaan tahtiinsa.

Completion alternatives

ei valinnaisia suoritustapoja

Practical training and working life cooperation

oppimisprojektit ovat työelämälähtöisiä

International connections

Toteutus on tarjolla vaihto-opiskleijoille.

Further information

Opintojakson laajuus voi vaihdella välillä 5-10 op.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.