Introduction to Visual Design (3 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

Students know how to use basic visual design tools.
Student is able to collaborate in an international student team.

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

Contemporary design tools

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

No exam

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Tasks, attendance, active participation, feedback to peers and teacher(s)

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

contact teaching (in English), individual and group tasks, virtual learning environment (Tabula), activity excursions, discussions, group work, giving and listening peer & teacher feedback, PBL on occasion, learning by doing, students as teachers

Oppimateriaalit

Course material given in class

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The student is expected to complete the course tasks partly outside the contact teaching times

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

The student can pass the contact teaching by:
1. filling in a starting query and that way showing that he or she has the required competence on the tools
2. showing a portfolio of previous design works
There will be a group meeting and review of the portfolios for those who do not attend the contact teaching.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

No preliminary requirements.
The course has one main task: Create a Learning Diary Poster, which summarizes the sub-tasks and different topics that have been dealt with during the contact teaching.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

1 = approved; half of the course tasks submitted; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; no feedback to peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the course tasks submitted; quality of tasks below average; attendance level low or average; hardly any feedback to peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

3 = good; all course tasks submitted; course attendance and feedback to peers satisfactory
4 = very good; all tasks rendered and submitted correctly in due time; good course attendance and activity; active feedback to peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

5 = excellent; all tasks rendered in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance and activity; active and well-thought feedback to peers and teacher(s)