Introduction to Visual Design (3 cr)
Code: IM00BR48-3003
General information
- Enrolment period
- 01.07.2015 - 20.08.2015
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 31.08.2015 - 23.10.2015
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 3 cr
- Local portion
- 3 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Media and Arts
- Campus
- TAMK Mediapolis
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 5 - 25
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
- Teachers
- Carita Forsgren
- Tuomo Joronen
- Person in charge
- Tuomo Joronen
- Small groups
- avoin (Size: 2 . Open UAS : 2.)
- Small groups
- avoin
- Course
- IM00BR48
Objectives (course unit)
Students know how to use basic visual design tools.
Student is able to collaborate in an international student team.
Content (course unit)
Contemporary design tools
Exam schedules
No exam
Evaluation methods and criteria
Tasks, attendance, active participation, feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
contact teaching (in English), individual and group tasks, virtual learning environment (Tabula), activity excursions, discussions, group work, giving and listening peer & teacher feedback, PBL on occasion, learning by doing, students as teachers
Learning materials
Course material given in class
Student workload
The student is expected to complete the course tasks partly outside the contact teaching times
Completion alternatives
The student can pass the contact teaching by:
1. filling in a starting query and that way showing that he or she has the required competence on the tools
2. showing a portfolio of previous design works
There will be a group meeting and review of the portfolios for those who do not attend the contact teaching.
Further information
No preliminary requirements.
The course has one main task: Create a Learning Diary Poster, which summarizes the sub-tasks and different topics that have been dealt with during the contact teaching.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1 = approved; half of the course tasks submitted; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; no feedback to peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the course tasks submitted; quality of tasks below average; attendance level low or average; hardly any feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3 = good; all course tasks submitted; course attendance and feedback to peers satisfactory
4 = very good; all tasks rendered and submitted correctly in due time; good course attendance and activity; active feedback to peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all tasks rendered in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance and activity; active and well-thought feedback to peers and teacher(s)