Study Guide

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise national and international expert and operational networks related to genome and genetic data in developing expertise
- is able to apply genomic and genetic data in the development of health care

Content (course unit)

- genome and gene knowledge and research
- genetic knowledge in health promotion and research
- client-oriented counselling
- gene therapy and future technologies
- national and international networks of experts

Prerequisites (course unit)

Participation in course on Personalised Health Promotion

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise the national network on genome data in the development of expertise, even if only in a limited manner
- is able to utilise genomic data in the development and management of the work community

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise extensively the national network on genome data in the development of expertise
- is able to utilise genomic data in the development and management of the work community

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise the national and international networks of genome data in developing his/her expertise
- is able to extensively utilise genome data in the development and management of the work community, and act on those networks

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

3. Reporting and Evaluating the Thesis (after gate 5 and final evaluation), 5c
Goals and contents
- producing a Master’s thesis and relevant materials, which follow TAMK’s instructions and research ethical principles
- presenting orally the justification and evaluation of the research methods, implementation, and the results of the thesis.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts depend on the degree programme
- finalising and publishing the Master’s thesis
- creating a poster
- checking for plagiarism – Turnit
- maturity test
- presenting the thesis in the evaluation situation
- written peer evaluation (will there be time for oral evaluation during the presentations also)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

1. Thesis Planning (gates 1-3), 5 cr
Goals and contents
- being able to select and delimit a topic for a working life based thesis, which supports the student’s own learning, and to write a thesis plan according to TAMK’s thesis instructions
- being able to use national and international sources and adhere to copyrights in planning the thesis,
- being able to choose the proper data collection and analysis methods, to consider the matters regarding data protection as well as the ethical principles of the field in question.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts
- idea paper, data search, preliminary literature review
- thesis plan
- thesis contract/permission
- peer review

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

Pass/Fail

Objectives (course unit)

The Student
• Masters the concepts of health promotion, its principles, and the factors influencing them, and is able to apply them extensively in their professional role
• Is able to apply ethical principles guiding health promotion and evaluate their implementation in various specific situations within their field

Content (course unit)

Content:
• Concepts and Guiding Principles of Health and Well-being Promotion
• Health Perceptions and Determinants of Health
• National and International Programs and Objectives
• Cultural Diversity in Health Promotion
• Ethical Principles of Health Promotion
• Sustainable Development and Planetary Health
• Digitalization

Assessment criteria, pass/fail (course unit)

Pass:
Student
• is able to use key concepts of health promotion and understand the factors influencing health promotion.
• is able to evaluate the significance of ethical principles in health promotion and apply them in practice.

Fail:
Student
• describes concepts and approaches superficially and narrowly.
• is unable to demonstrate an understanding of ethical principles and their application

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply diversely the key health promotion methods, theories and models
- is able to plan, implement and evaluate a health promotion project

Content (course unit)

Part 1: 5 cr
- Key health promotion methods and models
- Evaluating the effectiveness of health promotion


Part 2: 5 cr
- Design, implementation, evaluation and impact of health promotion activities
- Project management

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- knows the main health promotion methods, theories and models
- is able to plan and implement in a limited way a health promotion project

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply the essential methods, theories and models of health promotion
- is able to plan, execute and concisely evaluate a health promotion project in both the national and international environments

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- can apply and analyze a wide range of key health promotion methods, theories and models and develop new ones
- is able to plan, implement and evaluate a health promotion project in both the national and international environment

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply health promotion legislation and ethics in his/her activities
- is able to apply personalised health promotion methods and plan interventions based on new knowledge

Content (course unit)

- Personal health and health promotion
- Ethical issues in health promotion
- Specific issues on the use and utilization of genomic knowledge
- National and international legislation and instructions

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- knows the legislation and ethical principles of health promotion
- is able to utilisise the key methods for personalised health promotion in his/her actions

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply basic health promotion legislation and ethics in his/her activities
- is able to utilise the key methods of personalised health promotion in his/her activities

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- is able to implement health promotion in accordance with the governing legislation and critically evaluate the implementation of ethical principles and can educate other actors, using his/her expertise
- is able to actively search for evidence-based data about individual health promotion, apply it critically in his/her own activities and plan interventions in accordance with the new knowledge

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

3. Reporting and Evaluating the Thesis (after gate 5 and final evaluation), 5c
Goals and contents
- producing a Master’s thesis and relevant materials, which follow TAMK’s instructions and research ethical principles
- presenting orally the justification and evaluation of the research methods, implementation, and the results of the thesis.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts depend on the degree programme
- finalising and publishing the Master’s thesis
- creating a poster
- checking for plagiarism – Turnit
- maturity test
- presenting the thesis in the evaluation situation
- written peer evaluation (will there be time for oral evaluation during the presentations also)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

The Student
• Masters the concepts of health promotion, its principles, and the factors influencing them, and is able to apply them extensively in their professional role
• Is able to apply ethical principles guiding health promotion and evaluate their implementation in various specific situations within their field

Content (course unit)

Content:
• Concepts and Guiding Principles of Health and Well-being Promotion
• Health Perceptions and Determinants of Health
• National and International Programs and Objectives
• Cultural Diversity in Health Promotion
• Ethical Principles of Health Promotion
• Sustainable Development and Planetary Health
• Digitalization

Assessment criteria, pass/fail (course unit)

Pass:
Student
• is able to use key concepts of health promotion and understand the factors influencing health promotion.
• is able to evaluate the significance of ethical principles in health promotion and apply them in practice.

Fail:
Student
• describes concepts and approaches superficially and narrowly.
• is unable to demonstrate an understanding of ethical principles and their application

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

1. Thesis Planning (gates 1-3), 5 cr
Goals and contents
- being able to select and delimit a topic for a working life based thesis, which supports the student’s own learning, and to write a thesis plan according to TAMK’s thesis instructions
- being able to use national and international sources and adhere to copyrights in planning the thesis,
- being able to choose the proper data collection and analysis methods, to consider the matters regarding data protection as well as the ethical principles of the field in question.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts
- idea paper, data search, preliminary literature review
- thesis plan
- thesis contract/permission
- peer review

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

Pass/Fail

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply health promotion legislation and ethics in his/her activities
- is able to apply personalised health promotion methods and plan interventions based on new knowledge

Content (course unit)

- Personal health and health promotion
- Ethical issues in health promotion
- Specific issues on the use and utilization of genomic knowledge
- National and international legislation and instructions

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- knows the legislation and ethical principles of health promotion
- is able to utilisise the key methods for personalised health promotion in his/her actions

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply basic health promotion legislation and ethics in his/her activities
- is able to utilise the key methods of personalised health promotion in his/her activities

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- is able to implement health promotion in accordance with the governing legislation and critically evaluate the implementation of ethical principles and can educate other actors, using his/her expertise
- is able to actively search for evidence-based data about individual health promotion, apply it critically in his/her own activities and plan interventions in accordance with the new knowledge

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise national and international expert and operational networks related to genome and genetic data in developing expertise
- is able to apply genomic and genetic data in the development of health care

Content (course unit)

- genome and gene knowledge and research
- genetic knowledge in health promotion and research
- client-oriented counselling
- gene therapy and future technologies
- national and international networks of experts

Prerequisites (course unit)

Participation in course on Personalised Health Promotion

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise the national network on genome data in the development of expertise, even if only in a limited manner
- is able to utilise genomic data in the development and management of the work community

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise extensively the national network on genome data in the development of expertise
- is able to utilise genomic data in the development and management of the work community

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- is able to utilise the national and international networks of genome data in developing his/her expertise
- is able to extensively utilise genome data in the development and management of the work community, and act on those networks

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply diversely the key health promotion methods, theories and models
- is able to plan, implement and evaluate a health promotion project

Content (course unit)

Part 1: 5 cr
- Key health promotion methods and models
- Evaluating the effectiveness of health promotion


Part 2: 5 cr
- Design, implementation, evaluation and impact of health promotion activities
- Project management

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student
- knows the main health promotion methods, theories and models
- is able to plan and implement in a limited way a health promotion project

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply the essential methods, theories and models of health promotion
- is able to plan, execute and concisely evaluate a health promotion project in both the national and international environments

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- can apply and analyze a wide range of key health promotion methods, theories and models and develop new ones
- is able to plan, implement and evaluate a health promotion project in both the national and international environment

Assessment scale

0-5