Study Guide

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· recognize behavioral impact of cultural values in their own and others' behavior
· identify some work place challenges caused by cultural differences
· solve some challenges caused by cultural differences in the technology environment
· seek information and solutions for challenges caused by cultural differences
· manage challenges caused by cultural differences using risk management methods
· can identify global challenges, such as challenges related to climate change and resource scarcity

Content (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.
· information from multiple cultural studies
· leadership in a multicultural working environment
· multicultural organization models
· specifics of international projects
· risks of international projects

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.

Exam schedules

No exam but project presentation and course tasks

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Lecture, pre-assignment, individual task, pair group task, course project in trio group and presentation.

Learning materials

- Organization Culture and Leadership, Edgar H. Schein, 5th edition
- Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind, Geert Hofstede et. al, 3rd edition
- The Culture Map, Erin Meyer, 2015
- Suggested materials to moodle course site

Student workload

Total work hour for the students: 27 x 5 = 135
Lesson (contact, online & hybrid): 36 h
Course project: 30 h
Individual & pair task: 30 h
Reading time: 39 h

Completion alternatives

Talk to the course teacher

Practical training and working life cooperation

Own workplace related task

International connections

Possible

Further information

F2F lessons are important from learning point of view

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· participate in writing a contract
· choose various payment terms and payment guarantees
· prepare themselves for the situations and dispute resolution related to by the contract
· work in negotiation teams
· take into account legal regulation of public procurement, data protection, artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights
· act in global legal operating environments

Content (course unit)

Student knows the basics of contract law in selected countries and know few model contracts for manufacture, assembly and consulting of technology products. Students know the sales and purchasing negotiations process in an international environment, know how to prepare for negotiations and conduct themselves in demanding sales and purchasing process as well as can take into account contemporary business law issues. Students also know the most common negotiation tactics how to prepare in advance.

Topics:
· contract law in Finland and chosen countries
· contract models for various cases and the most common contract problems
· commercial dispute resolution
· synchronizing contract, cash flow and delivery
· contemporary business law issues
· negotiation process in the international environment, negotiation tactics and preparation before negotiations
· several case lectures by industry representatives who present examples and solutions to international challenges

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student recognizes the basic principles of general contract law.
The student understands basic differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration).
The student recognizes different negotiation tactics and the main features of the negotiation process in an international environment.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student understands the basic principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and working in an international environment.
The student understands different negotiation tactics and the main features of the negotiation process in an international environment.The student is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and in an international environment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent understanding of the key principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court versus arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned excellently in working life and in an international environment.
The student has an excellent understanding of different negotiation tactics as well as the main features and key operating methods of the negotiation process in an international environment. The student is able to apply the lessons learned excellently in working life and in an international environment.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

1. Thesis Planning (gates 1-3), 5 cr
Goals and contents
- being able to select and delimit a topic for a working life based thesis, which supports the student’s own learning, and to write a thesis plan according to TAMK’s thesis instructions
- being able to use national and international sources and adhere to copyrights in planning the thesis,
- being able to choose the proper data collection and analysis methods, to consider the matters regarding data protection as well as the ethical principles of the field in question.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts
- idea paper, data search, preliminary literature review
- thesis plan
- thesis contract/permission
- peer review

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

2. Implementing the Thesis (after gate 4), 20 cr
Goals and contents

- keeping up with and advancing the development of their field, applying the knowledge, theories, central terms, methods, and principles of their field critically in their own thesis
- being able to apply the suitable research approach in their thesis
- being able to implement the thesis according to plan, while taking advantage of the guidance offered.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts depend on the degree programme
- implementing empirical and/or theoretical part and writing the report
- methodological studies
- data privacy statement
- participation in thesis seminars and guidance events and peer evaluation

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

During the course, students familiarize themselves with the current and future themes of people leadership.

After completing the course, the students:
· identify and develop their own way of acting as a leader
· know the central practices of modern leadership, reflect and apply them in different situations
· understand the importance of leadership in team activities
· identify different ways to motivate team members
· can observe and identify sustainable themes related to leadership and digital opportunities.

Content (course unit)

Topics covered:
· strategy-oriented leadership
· individual personality traits and leadership
· identifying and developing individual motivation
· working in teams and leading teams
· competence management and coaching in an expert organization
· management in situations of change
· the importance of communication in leadership
· leadership trends in the future

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student recognizes the importance of management in an expert organization. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership, but is not able to apply them to their own work or previous experiences or to solving challenging leadership situations.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student understands the impact of leadership in teams and organizations. The participant is able to list the key aspects of leadership and to some extent is able to apply them to their own work or to their previous experiences and to solving challenging leadership situations together with others.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent understanding of the leadership of experts in organizations. The participant is able to apply and further develop key aspects of leadership both to their own work and to solve challenging leadership situations together with others. The participants are able to reflect on their own activities and skills in a versatile way, and to develop their own activities from a leadership perspective.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· plan the different phases of the technology project (according to PMBOK guidelines)
· utilize project management software (such as ProjectLibre) for planning and monitoring
· develop a comprehensive and realistic project plan
· determine the utilization of resources, scheduling, and cost
· predict the completion time and final costs
· adapt the project according to the requirements of technology, contractors, and suppliers
· respond promptly to changes in the project situation

Content (course unit)

The students are able to plan, implement and manage demanding projects. Required skills are reached when students can create realistic project plans to supervise, forecast the project and manage project change.
· project management achievements
· project management terminology
· organizing projects
· project management skill areas (according to Ipma)
· project benefits and goals
· project life cycle and work break down structure
· project schedule, resourcing and costing
· project risk management
· project cost management (earned value, pert chart and committed cost)
· good practices
· project portfolio management
· project models and project management development

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student is able to identify the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity. The student's project plan is incomplete. Various sections have not been done theoretically right. Schedule is static and becomes a mess with changes.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student is familiar with the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity, and is able to justify and apply his / her learning. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student knows and understands broadly the main principles, basic concepts and tools of project activity. The student is able not only to justify and apply his / her learning, but also to critically evaluate his / her own solutions. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.Students show also the methods used to supervise and forecast the project outcome. The project plan also accounts for the steering group and other groups.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· retrieve cost information in a complex technological environment
· calculate the desired cost in a complex technological environment
· examine and process business data from a value network schema perspective
· seek the optimal cost level and enhance profitability
· define a business strategy and metrics to support management´s work
· based on the information generated, articulate concrete actions for organizational management, whether within a team or independently

Content (course unit)

Student can use figures from management accounting in decision making and knows what to demand from management accounting. Student masters the basics of profitability, cost effectiveness and overhead costing. Student can calculate the cost and added value of an value network. Student knows key customer management and customer based costing and how value is created.
Topics:
Cost management
· trends in macroeconomics and their application in corporation economics
· product cost, total costs and its indicators in engineering and decision making in a multiple product environment
· internal and management accounting
· goal costing in product development and production
· budgeting
· customer profit and pricing strategies
· systems thinking in economics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student understands the importance of internal accounting metrics and can apply them at a basic level in their managerial work. The student recognizes the fundamentals of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking, but their deeper understanding and application in their work remain incomplete. The student can explain the principles of value chain cost and value creation and has a basic awareness of customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student masters internal accounting metrics and can apply them effectively in their managerial work. The student demonstrates a strong understanding of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking and can apply them in their work and decision-making. The student can define and analyze the principles of value chain cost and value creation and use them in business development. The student is familiar with customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles and can apply them in practical situations.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent command of internal accounting metrics and can apply them effectively and innovatively in their managerial work. The student demonstrates a profound understanding of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking and is capable of creative and analytical problem-solving based on these principles. The student can accurately define and analyze the principles of value chain cost and value creation and use them in strategic decision-making and business development. Additionally, the student masters customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles and can innovatively apply them in complex and challenging practical situations.

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· plan the different phases of the technology project (according to PMBOK guidelines)
· utilize project management software (such as ProjectLibre) for planning and monitoring
· develop a comprehensive and realistic project plan
· determine the utilization of resources, scheduling, and cost
· predict the completion time and final costs
· adapt the project according to the requirements of technology, contractors, and suppliers
· respond promptly to changes in the project situation

Content (course unit)

The students are able to plan, implement and manage demanding projects. Required skills are reached when students can create realistic project plans to supervise, forecast the project and manage project change.
· project management achievements
· project management terminology
· organizing projects
· project management skill areas (according to Ipma)
· project benefits and goals
· project life cycle and work break down structure
· project schedule, resourcing and costing
· project risk management
· project cost management (earned value, pert chart and committed cost)
· good practices
· project portfolio management
· project models and project management development

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student is able to identify the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity. The student's project plan is incomplete. Various sections have not been done theoretically right. Schedule is static and becomes a mess with changes.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student is familiar with the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity, and is able to justify and apply his / her learning. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student knows and understands broadly the main principles, basic concepts and tools of project activity. The student is able not only to justify and apply his / her learning, but also to critically evaluate his / her own solutions. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.Students show also the methods used to supervise and forecast the project outcome. The project plan also accounts for the steering group and other groups.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· participate in writing a contract
· choose various payment terms and payment guarantees
· prepare themselves for the situations and dispute resolution related to by the contract
· work in negotiation teams
· take into account legal regulation of public procurement, data protection, artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights
· act in global legal operating environments

Content (course unit)

Student knows the basics of contract law in selected countries and know few model contracts for manufacture, assembly and consulting of technology products. Students know the sales and purchasing negotiations process in an international environment, know how to prepare for negotiations and conduct themselves in demanding sales and purchasing process as well as can take into account contemporary business law issues. Students also know the most common negotiation tactics how to prepare in advance.

Topics:
· contract law in Finland and chosen countries
· contract models for various cases and the most common contract problems
· commercial dispute resolution
· synchronizing contract, cash flow and delivery
· contemporary business law issues
· negotiation process in the international environment, negotiation tactics and preparation before negotiations
· several case lectures by industry representatives who present examples and solutions to international challenges

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student recognizes the basic principles of general contract law.
The student understands basic differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration).
The student recognizes different negotiation tactics and the main features of the negotiation process in an international environment.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student understands the basic principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and working in an international environment.
The student understands different negotiation tactics and the main features of the negotiation process in an international environment.The student is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and in an international environment.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent understanding of the key principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court versus arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned excellently in working life and in an international environment.
The student has an excellent understanding of different negotiation tactics as well as the main features and key operating methods of the negotiation process in an international environment. The student is able to apply the lessons learned excellently in working life and in an international environment.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

During the course, students familiarize themselves with the current and future themes of people leadership.

After completing the course, the students:
· identify and develop their own way of acting as a leader
· know the central practices of modern leadership, reflect and apply them in different situations
· understand the importance of leadership in team activities
· identify different ways to motivate team members
· can observe and identify sustainable themes related to leadership and digital opportunities.

Content (course unit)

Topics covered:
· strategy-oriented leadership
· individual personality traits and leadership
· identifying and developing individual motivation
· working in teams and leading teams
· competence management and coaching in an expert organization
· management in situations of change
· the importance of communication in leadership
· leadership trends in the future

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student recognizes the importance of management in an expert organization. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership, but is not able to apply them to their own work or previous experiences or to solving challenging leadership situations.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student understands the impact of leadership in teams and organizations. The participant is able to list the key aspects of leadership and to some extent is able to apply them to their own work or to their previous experiences and to solving challenging leadership situations together with others.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent understanding of the leadership of experts in organizations. The participant is able to apply and further develop key aspects of leadership both to their own work and to solve challenging leadership situations together with others. The participants are able to reflect on their own activities and skills in a versatile way, and to develop their own activities from a leadership perspective.

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· retrieve cost information in a complex technological environment
· calculate the desired cost in a complex technological environment
· examine and process business data from a value network schema perspective
· seek the optimal cost level and enhance profitability
· define a business strategy and metrics to support management´s work
· based on the information generated, articulate concrete actions for organizational management, whether within a team or independently

Content (course unit)

Student can use figures from management accounting in decision making and knows what to demand from management accounting. Student masters the basics of profitability, cost effectiveness and overhead costing. Student can calculate the cost and added value of an value network. Student knows key customer management and customer based costing and how value is created.
Topics:
Cost management
· trends in macroeconomics and their application in corporation economics
· product cost, total costs and its indicators in engineering and decision making in a multiple product environment
· internal and management accounting
· goal costing in product development and production
· budgeting
· customer profit and pricing strategies
· systems thinking in economics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The student understands the importance of internal accounting metrics and can apply them at a basic level in their managerial work. The student recognizes the fundamentals of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking, but their deeper understanding and application in their work remain incomplete. The student can explain the principles of value chain cost and value creation and has a basic awareness of customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student masters internal accounting metrics and can apply them effectively in their managerial work. The student demonstrates a strong understanding of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking and can apply them in their work and decision-making. The student can define and analyze the principles of value chain cost and value creation and use them in business development. The student is familiar with customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles and can apply them in practical situations.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student has an excellent command of internal accounting metrics and can apply them effectively and innovatively in their managerial work. The student demonstrates a profound understanding of profitability, cost efficiency, and margin thinking and is capable of creative and analytical problem-solving based on these principles. The student can accurately define and analyze the principles of value chain cost and value creation and use them in strategic decision-making and business development. Additionally, the student masters customer relationship management and customer-centric cost and value creation principles and can innovatively apply them in complex and challenging practical situations.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
· recognize behavioral impact of cultural values in their own and others' behavior
· identify some work place challenges caused by cultural differences
· solve some challenges caused by cultural differences in the technology environment
· seek information and solutions for challenges caused by cultural differences
· manage challenges caused by cultural differences using risk management methods
· can identify global challenges, such as challenges related to climate change and resource scarcity

Content (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.
· information from multiple cultural studies
· leadership in a multicultural working environment
· multicultural organization models
· specifics of international projects
· risks of international projects

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.

Exam schedules

No exam but project presentation and course tasks

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Lecture, pre-assignment, individual task, pair group task, course project in trio group and presentation.

Learning materials

- Organization Culture and Leadership, Edgar H. Schein, 5th edition
- Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind, Geert Hofstede et. al, 3rd edition
- The Culture Map, Erin Meyer, 2015
- Suggested materials to moodle course site

Student workload

Total work hour for the students: 27 x 5 = 135
Lesson (contact, online & hybrid): 36 h
Course project: 30 h
Individual & pair task: 30 h
Reading time: 39 h

Completion alternatives

Talk to the course teacher

Practical training and working life cooperation

Own workplace related task

International connections

Possible

Further information

F2F lessons are important from learning point of view

Objectives (course unit)

1. Thesis Planning (gates 1-3), 5 cr
Goals and contents
- being able to select and delimit a topic for a working life based thesis, which supports the student’s own learning, and to write a thesis plan according to TAMK’s thesis instructions
- being able to use national and international sources and adhere to copyrights in planning the thesis,
- being able to choose the proper data collection and analysis methods, to consider the matters regarding data protection as well as the ethical principles of the field in question.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts
- idea paper, data search, preliminary literature review
- thesis plan
- thesis contract/permission
- peer review

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5

Objectives (course unit)

2. Implementing the Thesis (after gate 4), 20 cr
Goals and contents

- keeping up with and advancing the development of their field, applying the knowledge, theories, central terms, methods, and principles of their field critically in their own thesis
- being able to apply the suitable research approach in their thesis
- being able to implement the thesis according to plan, while taking advantage of the guidance offered.

Content (course unit)

Implementation parts depend on the degree programme
- implementing empirical and/or theoretical part and writing the report
- methodological studies
- data privacy statement
- participation in thesis seminars and guidance events and peer evaluation

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Assessment criteria can be found from TAMK's web pages: https://intra.tuni.fi/en/handbook?page=3104. In the thesis guide there is seperate master's thesis assessment criteria. During the process 'Thesis plan' is assessed as failed/passed. In the end of the thesis process failed/passed is turned to a general rating.

Assessment scale

0-5