Web/App Design Project 1 (5 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

Student is able to

- implement a web or app design production project
- analyse their know how, used production techniques and outcomes
- collaborate in an international student team
- pay attention to the needs of customers and network
- utilize possibilities of sustainable production methods.

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

- Planning and implementing an individual or collaborative production project
- Producing a real life production work using resources available
- Networking

Esitietovaatimukset (Opintojakso)

Basics of the subject.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (Opintojakso)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (Opintojakso)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Aika ja paikka

Zoom

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Course work project + student activity

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Independent work with teachers coaching

Oppimateriaalit

Digital resources

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

5 x 27 h for each project

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

0 = not approved; less than half of the required work performed; clear misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).