Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Scientific and Professional Communication (5 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: 5E00EM76-3003

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika

07.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

Ajoitus

01.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

Laajuus

5 op

Toteutustapa

Lähiopetus

Yksikkö

Environmental Engineering

Toimipiste

TAMK Pääkampus

Opetuskielet

  • Englanti

Koulutus

  • Bachelor's Degree Programme in Environmental Engineering
  • Avoin ammattikorkeakoulu

Opettaja

  • Johannes Jermakka
  • Emilia Ali-Löytty

Vastuuhenkilö

Emilia Ali-Löytty

Ryhmät

  • 21IENVE
    Degree Programme in Environmental Engineering

Tavoitteet (OJ)

After completing this course the students will:
• know the principles of scientific research: qualitative and quantitative research and you can identify a research study accordingly
• be able to deploy on a larger scale all the writing skills, which you have been developing throughout the degree programme

• consider the audience and the brief for each communication task
• be able to give professional presentations about your own work and host events with your colleagues and co-workers in a good manner.
• know the main statistical analysis methods in experimental research and can use them in practice
• know the procedure of the thesis process at TAMK and requirements of a thesis
• be able to plan an experimental research study

• Student clearly demands help in many phases of the research process. The submissions show narrow or incomplete understanding of the connection between research questions, background literature, choice of methodology, study design, reporting and concluding. Student shows some knowledge of of conceptual and theoretical thinking in doing research. Difficulty in activating the audience.

Sisältö (OJ)

Bachelor’s thesis planning and writing processes, professional reporting and presentations, research and data collection methods, data analysis, work life connections.

Esitietovaatimukset (OJ)

Scientific Reporting in English, English for Students of Environmental Engineers, Statistics or equivalent

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

Student clearly demands help in many phases of the research process. The submissions show narrow or incomplete understanding of the connection between research questions, background literature, choice of methodology, study design, reporting and concluding. Student shows some knowledge of of conceptual and theoretical thinking in doing research.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

Student is able to write clear research documents. (S)He can justify the decisions on methods, context or study approach. The student is able to find useful resources and design a study which can be put into practice. The student is able to present results and draw reasonable conclusions based on the results. Student make choices about the research methods, but uses concepts and arguments is lightly. The student shows the ability to choose an appropriate register and is able to activate an audience.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

Student is able to write clear research documents. (S)He can justify the decisions on methods, context or study approach. The student is able to find useful resources and design a study which can be put into practice. The student is able to present results and draw reasonable conclusions based on the results. Student make choices about the research methods, but uses concepts and arguments is lightly. The student shows the ability to choose an appropriate register and is able to activate an audience.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5