Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet (OJ)

Student:
- Is able to define the concept of quality and its dimensions
- knows the principles and process of quality management
- is able to define the concept of effectivity
- is able to independently design quality assurance process and analyze it critically
- knows and identifies the possibilities and limitations for measuring effectivity

Sisältö (OJ)

Contents
Definitions of quality
Quality management, process, and methods
The concept of effectivity and impact and related concepts
The impact evaluation process and its phases (objects, solution, output, result, impact)
Effectiveness evaluation as part of the decision-making process and quality evaluation process as part of the action

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

The student knows the principles of quality assurance. The student is able to design the effectiveness evaluation process and its phases and knows the key methods of evaluation in their own work field. The student recognizes the importance of quality assurance and effectiveness evaluation as part of the decision-making process and action.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

The student is able to apply the principles of quality assurance. The student is independently able to design the effectiveness evaluation process and its phases and knows the key methods of evaluation in their own work field. The student is able to analyze the meaning of quality assurance and effectiveness evaluation as part of the decision-making process and action.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

The student is able to apply and analyze the principles of quality assurance. The student is able to design and develop the effectiveness evaluation process and its phases and is able to apply and develop evaluation methods in their work in their own work field. The student is able to argue the use of quality assurance and effectiveness evaluation as part of the decision-making process and recognizes the importance of quality assurance and impact assessment as part of decision-making and can integrate evaluation into activities.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5