Writing Scientific Reports in English (3op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: 5E00EK30-3007
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ilmoittautumisaika
- 02.08.2022 - 15.09.2022
- Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on päättynyt.
- Ajoitus
- 01.08.2022 - 10.12.2022
- Toteutus on päättynyt.
- Laajuus
- 3 op
- Toteutustapa
- Lähiopetus
- Yksikkö
- TAMK Kielet ja viestintä
- Toimipiste
- TAMK Pääkampus
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Koulutus
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Environmental Engineering
- Avoin ammattikorkeakoulu
- Opettajat
- Taru Owston
- Emmanuel Abruquah
- Vastuuhenkilö
- Emmanuel Abruquah
- Ryhmät
-
22IENVEDegree Programme in Environmental Engineering
- Opintojakso
- 5E00EK30
Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)
After completing the course students have achieved the following skills realistic evaluation of one’s own language (English) learning skills, accessing information from a wide range of sources, critical evaluation of information and competence in scientific reporting.
Sisältö (Opintojakso)
The students will practice producing reports which are logically structured, cover sufficient and relevant content, include appropriately labelled graphics, follow the norms for referencing and lay-out, and are written in clear and accurate English.
The students will develop their skills in summarising, paraphrasing and synthesise source materials.
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)
The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (Opintojakso)
Student's English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently, source materials are adequately paraphrased.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (Opintojakso)
Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased.
Aika ja paikka
In-person
Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat
There is no exam in this course.
Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet
The assessment is based on successful completion of the following tasks and activities:
• Technical report related to the field of study – 70%
• Active participation (participation in class activities, contribution to discussions, independent work assignments) – 30%
Arviointiasteikko
0-5
Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät
Contact teaching (Zoom), coaching, presentations, discussions, group work, individual and collaborative online activities, self-study.
Oppimateriaalit
• Materials in Moodle
• Online resources
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
Contact lessons (Zoom) – 15 x 2 h = 30 h
Independent study – 50 h
Sisällön jaksotus
• Writing skills (reports, essays, work-related documents)
• Oral skills (general communication)
• Grammar as needed
Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat
None.
Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)
The student has not attended 80% of the classes and has not participated in the lessons.
- cannot use TAMK's report template correctly
- has not incorporated in-text references any their reports
Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)
- used the report template correctly.
- use the report guide correctly but with a few errors.
- submitted the required assignments
Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)
- used the report template correctly.
- use the report guide correctly but with limited errors.
- submitted the required assignments
- participated fully in both online and in-person sessions.
- language is readable and comprehensible
Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)
- used the report template correctly.
- use the report guide correctly but with no errors.
- in-text references are accurately written
- the list of references is accurately written
- submitted the required assignments
- participated fully in both online and in-person sessions.
- language is readable and comprehensible