Water and Waste Water Engineering (4 op)

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

Open book Tabula exam at the end of the course.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

The course consists of lectures and discussions, exercises and assignments, compulsory laboratory exercises (3) and exam. Together these form the course grade as follows:
short assignments max. 40 points; laboratory reports max. 30 points; exam max. 30 points
Grade 0: 0-29 points; grade 1: 30-44 points; grade 2: 45-59 points; grade 3:60-74 points; grade 4: 75-89 points; grade 5: 90-100 points.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Contact teaching, laboratory exercises, assignments, exam

Oppimateriaalit

Handouts posted in Tabula
Textbook: George Tchobanoglous & Edward D. Schroeder: Water Quality

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Contact lectures and exercises, exam 28 h
Laboratory exercises 12 h
Self study (including assignments and laboratory reports) 60 h
Total 100 h

Sisällön jaksotus

Concept of water and wastewater management, sources of water, use of water, characteristics of water and their significance from environmental health point of view, unit operations used in water and wastewater treatment, drinking water production, wastewater treatment, alternative wastewater management options and future perspectives.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is not familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has no basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course but often makes mistakes when applying them
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
This means that:
-the assignments were done properly
-student is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
This means that:
-the assignments were done properly
-student is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest