Monitoring Techniques (3 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Opiskelija osaa:
-suunnitella ja ohjelmoida automaatiolaitteiden ja -järjestelmien käyttöliittymiä
-WinCC-valvomo -ohjelmiston perusteet
-metsoDna-järjestelmän käyttöliittymän perusteet

Content (course unit)

WinCC-valvomo-ohjelmiston ja metsoDna-järjestelmän käyttöliittymä. Harjoitustyö käyttäen molempien valvomo-ohjelmistojen konfigurointityökaluja.

Prerequisites (course unit)

Logiikkaohjelmoinnin perusteet, Ohjelmoitavat logiikat 1, Ohjelmoitavat logiikat 2, Teollisuusautomaatio.

Exam schedules

Presented in the 1st lesson with the information in Moodle.

Evaluation methods and criteria

Share of the course "Control Engineering":
Presented in the 1st lesson with the information in Moodle.

The experiment includes sections on WinCC and Valmet DNA systems. The weights are equal when the grade is given.
The assignment is evaluated as accepted / rejected. The assignment must be passed in order to receive the grade obtained in the exam.
Both sections (WinCC and DNAuse) must obtain an acceptable grade.
No attendance obligation.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Contact teaching, assignments and demonstrations.

Learning materials

Share of the course "Control Engineering":
Software (WinCC and DNAuse) manuals

Student workload

Share of the course "Control Engineering":
Total workload: 3 * 27h = 81 h
Upcoming lessons: 14 * 2h
Independent work: approx. 53 h.

Completion alternatives

None

Practical training and working life cooperation

None.

International connections

None.

Further information

Prerequisites:
Programmable Logic 1, Programmable Logic 2, S-05143 Industrial Automation
Learning objectives:
I can design and program user interfaces for automation equipment and systems and understand the most common user interface technologies.
I know the basics of WinCC control room software
I know the basics of the Valmet Dna control room software.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

A failed grade obtained in either or both (DNA and WinCC) subtests.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The ability to implement the simplest dynamic elements in the user interface using editors demonstrated in experiments (DNA and WinCC).

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Experiments (DNA and WinCC) show the programming of the user interface with minor errors using editors.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Experiments (DNA and WinCC) show flawless programming of the user interface using editors.