PLM (3 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

The student understands the control of the lifespan of product information, a product structure and these significance in the designing tasks and development tasks of mechanical products. The student understands the significance of the product data management, the possibilities and demands as a part of both the machine design and the product control.

Content (course unit)

PDM, PLM. The control of the lifespan of product information (LCA), a product structure, the product data management.

Prerequisites (course unit)

Students hasa knowledge of machine element design and student can design machine parts using CAE-systems.

Location and time

Periods 3/21, 4/21.

Exam schedules

No exam.

Evaluation methods and criteria

Exercises and seminar.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Lectures and exercises, Zoom.

Learning materials

Moodle.

Student workload

3 h / week.

Content scheduling

PLM. Product information, product structure and product lifecycle management in the design and product development process.

Completion alternatives

No.

Practical training and working life cooperation

No.

International connections

No.

Further information

Knows product information, product structure and product life cycle management and their importance in the design and development tasks of mechanical engineering products and is able to apply the requirements of product information, product structure and product life cycle management in machine design. Knows the importance, possibilities and requirements of product information management as part of both machine design and product management.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student does not participate in the teaching and does not return the assignments.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student understands the basics and key concepts of a PLM system. The student is able to use the PLM system helpfully. Participating in group assignments is a bit disgusting. Does not actively support the goals of the group's activities. Giving and receiving feedback is wet.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student understands the basics and key concepts of a PLM system. The student is able to use the PLM system independently. Participates in group assignments quite enthusiastically. Supports the goals of the group's activities reasonably actively. Giving and receiving feedback is fairly effortless.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student understands the basics and key concepts of a PLM system well. The student is able to use the PLM system independently, and finds new ways of using it. Participates in group assignments very enthusiastically. Supports the goals of the group's activities very actively. Giving and receiving feedback is constructive and action-enhancing.