Environmental Monitoring and Measurements (4 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

After completing this course the student:
- Knows the principles of essential measurement and monitoring methods used in evaluation of the state of the environment;
- Can use equipment and modelling software utilized in environmental evaluations; and,
- Can do critical evaluation of measurements and their connection to the state of environment and legislation.

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

A selection of following themes:
- Air quality monitoring, fine particle and gas emissions;
- Measurement of noise and radiation;
- Modelling of noise and air pollution; and,
- Water monitoring and different measurement technologies.

Esitietovaatimukset (Opintojakso)

Writing Scientific Reports in English, Physics Laboratories, Industrial Emissions and Monitoring

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assessment is based on measurement and modelling work, reporting and exam
Weighting:
Noise measurements and modelling , report 40%
Air quality monitoring, report 40%
(Exam 20% there is no exam for the noise modelling portion of the course)

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Contact teaching OR online teaching
Measurement work (if possible)
Co-operative and independent studying
Computer simulation modelling work
Guidance with video material
Written reports

Oppimateriaalit

Lecture material in moodle.tuni.fi
Online resources

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Classes: 24h
Independent modelling work 36 h
Independent self study, measurements and reporting 48h
Total 108 h

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Missing reports.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student is able to analyse simple noise and particle modelling cases both qualitatively and quantitatively. Student needs extra support to be able to complete given tasks. Exercises have been done, but results might be slightly erroneous or conclusions are incomplete. Student might have trouble following given deadlines.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student is able to use correct terminology and presents justified qualitative and quantitative analysis. Exercises are done completely, and results and analysis are correct. Results are at least briefly commented. Student doesn't fully understand the meaning or limitations of simulations.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student shows the ability to do versatile qualitative and quantitative analysis. Student has a realistic knowledge of the limitations of the theoretical framework. Reports are comprehensive and well-structured. Student is able to clearly show his or her own conclusions related to the results, applications and legislation.