Skip to main content

English for Vehicle Engineering Professionals (3 cr)

Code: 5C00CY60-3004

General information


Enrolment period
02.12.2019 - 05.01.2020
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
07.01.2020 - 21.02.2020
Implementation has ended.
Credits
3 cr
Local portion
2 cr
Virtual portion
1 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
Vehicle Engineering
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
Finnish
English
Degree programmes
Degree Programme in Vehicle Engineering, students who began in 2014-2018
Teachers
Elena Grigorova
Kirsi Saarinen
Course
5C00CY60

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able to:
- achieve results in work related communication situations (e.g. presentations, negotiations, various customer service situations)
- write documents for job applications and manage job interviews
work in multicultural environment
- communicate with professional terminology

Content (course unit)

- Work related communication situations (e.g. product/machine/equipment/process presentations, conferences and negotiations, trade shows)
- Job applications
- Professional terminology
- Internet studies with a foreign student group (e.g. Hannover University of Applied Sciences)

Prerequisites (course unit)

Recommended Working English for Engineers or similar knowledge

Location and time

3.periodin ajan:
Keskiviikkoisin klo 8-10 Ryhmä 1 (Kirsi Saarinen)
Keskiviikkoisin klo 8-10 Ryhmä 2 (Elena Grigorova)

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Hyväksytty arvosana 1-5
-demonstration
-report
-article + discussion hyväksytty
-job interview hyväksytty
-osallistuminen lähiopetukseen
-Tabula-tehtävien ja kotitehtävien suorittaminen hyväksytysti
-opintojaksopalaute

Learning materials

Opintojaksolla jaettaja (tuntien yhteydessä ja Tabulassa) ja yksin ja yhdessä koottu ja tuotettu aineisto.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

-opiskelija ei pysty osallistumaan suullisen vuorovaikutukseen, koska ongelmia tuottaa omaa puhetta ja/ tai ymmärtää muiden osapuolten puhetta
-ääntäminen vaikeasti ymmärrettävää
-opiskelija hallitsee erittäin suppean sanaston, joka ei riitä tilanteesta suoriutumaan. Käyttää toistuvasti sopimattomia sanoja ja sanontoja
-perusrakenteiden hallinta puutteellista
-opiskelija ei suoriudu kirjallisista viestintätilanteista asianmukaisella tavalla
-ei kirjoita ymmärrettävästi
-vaikeuksia löytää tietoa tekstistä, jotka käsittelevät tuttuja aiheita

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student completes the tasks.
The student is able to
- enter unprepared into conversation on topics that are familiar, of personal interest or pertinent to everyday life (e.g. family, hobbies, work, travel and current events).
- briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans.
- write simple connected text on topics which are familiar or of personal interest. I can write personal letters describing experiences and impressions

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student is able to
- interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible.
- take an active part in discussion in familiar contexts
- present clear, detailed descriptions on a wide range of subjects.
- explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options.
- write clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects as well as abstracts of material related to one's own field

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student:
- can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions. - is able to use language flexibly and effectively for social and professional purposes. Is able to formulate ideas and opinions with precision and relate my contribution skilfully to those of other speakers.
can present clear, detailed descriptions of complex subjects integrating sub-themes, developing particular points and rounding off with an appropriate conclusion
- can express him/herself in clear, well-structured text, expressing points of view at some length.
- can write about complex subjects in a letter, an essay or a report, underlining what I consider to be the salient issues. Can select a style appropriate to the reader in mind

Go back to top of page