Academic Writing Skills (2op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: 3E00EJ08-3001
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ilmoittautumisaika
- 02.12.2019 - 31.12.2020
- Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on päättynyt.
- Ajoitus
- 01.01.2020 - 31.07.2020
- Toteutus on päättynyt.
- Laajuus
- 2 op
- Virtuaaliosuus
- 2 op
- Toteutustapa
- Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu
- Yksikkö
- Liiketalous ja media
- Toimipiste
- TAMK Pääkampus
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Paikat
- 1 - 30
- Koulutus
- Master's Degree Programme in Educational Leadership
Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)
After this course students can
-organize their text so that it is coherent and easy to follow
-apply the typical features of academic style and vocabulary in their own thesis
-analyze the structure of academic texts to find topic sentences and transition words
-paraphrase and summarize their reading and use citations to justify their own argumentation
-write a logical and coherent thesis abstract
Sisältö (Opintojakso)
Structure and organization of texts
Academic language and style
Praphrasing ans summarizing
Literature review
Discussing Results
Thesis abstract
Esitietovaatimukset (Opintojakso)
English at level B2
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (Opintojakso)
PASS
The student's text is well-organized and coherent.
It is academic in style and vocabulary.
Their own voice is clear.
They use referencing to support and justify their own argumentation and findings.
They edit their text based on feedback and give constructive feedback to fellow students.
FAIL
The student's text is disorganized and difficult to follow.
It suffers from register clashes and poor structure.
The literature review is mainly a summary of other writers' ideas and texts.
Poor referencing technique doesn't make clear which is the student's voice, which is borrowed from somebody else.
The student doesn't utilize feedback and is not able to give constructive feedback.
Arviointikriteerit, hyväksytty/hylätty (Opintojakso)
PASS
The student's text is well-organized and coherent.
It is academic in style and vocabulary.
Their own voice is clear.
They use referencing to support and justify their own argumentation and findings.
They edit their text based on feedback and give constructive feedback to fellow students.
FAIL
The student's text is disorganized and difficult to follow.
It suffers from register clashes and poor structure.
The literature review is mainly a summary of other writers' ideas and texts.
Poor referencing technique doesn't make clear which is the student's voice, which is borrowed from somebody else.
The student doesn't utilize feedback and is not able to give constructive feedback
Aika ja paikka
Available online for free access anytime
Arviointiasteikko
Hyväksytty/hylätty
Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät
Self-study and peer feedback online
Oppimateriaalit
in Tabula
Sisällön jaksotus
Structure and organization of academic texts
Academic style and language
Literature review
Discussing your results
Writing your abstract
Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat
You can either do 1cr by completing the first three Lesdons, or 2 cr by completing all four Lessons.
Lisätietoja opiskelijoille
You can either do 1cr by completing the first three Lesdons, or 2 cr by completing all four Lessons.
There is little facilitation on this course. Students give feedback to and support each other.
Arviointikriteerit - hyväksytty/hylätty (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)
Written tasks and giving feedback to peer students. ’Pass’ when all the tasks have been successfully completed including required feedback to peers.
The course has an activity tracking feature on in Tabula.