Writing Scientific Reports in English (3 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

After completing the course students have achieved the following skills:
- Realistic evaluation of one’s own language (English) learning skills
- Accessing information from a wide range of sources
- Critical evaluation of information
- Competence in scientific reporting

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

The students will practice producing reports which are logically structured, cover sufficient and relevant content, include appropriately labelled graphics, follow the norms for referencing and lay-out, and are written in clear and accurate English.
The students will develop their skills in summarising, paraphrasing and synthesise source materials.

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

No exam, complete tasks.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

There will be no exam. The grade is given based on completion of tasks and the level of writing and reporting skills. Attendance 80%.

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Workshops
Writing exercises
Practice of specific writing skills
Written assignments

Oppimateriaalit

Materials will be supplied in class and posted in Tabula.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Students attend one three hour session each week and have tasks and report to complete every week.
It is important to reserve time for individual work.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

Showing competence in the agreed manner (contact teachers via e-mail)

Harjoittelu- ja työelämäyhteistyö

Mini research tasks

Kansainvälisyys

International group.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

This course is integrated with the following 1st-year courses
- Physics
- Soil Science
In order to be succesful in all three courses it is very important to keep to the planned schedule.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

One or more of the reports submitted fail to meet the specific criteria.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included. 80% attendance.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student's English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently, source materials are adequately paraphrased. 80% attendance.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased.80% attendance.