Clean Room Work and Cleanliness of Indoor Air (5 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Student knows the effect of human activity in cleanroom work and knows the principles in cleanroom work. Student knows the requirements of GMP regulations in aseptic production. Student is able to evaluate the indoor air of the working environment. Student knows the most common research methods for indoor air and understands the effect of cleaning on indoor air.

Content (course unit)

- Cleanrooms, cleanroom classification
- Human in a cleanroom, cleanroom work
- Cleanroom clothing and means of protection
- Cleanroom cleaning
- Cleanroom control methods
- GMP Good Manufacturing Practice
- Aseptic production
- Indoor air of operational environment: effects on health, productivity and wellbeing
- Indoor air measurements
- Excursion to indoor air seminar or familiarising oneself with seminar reports

Exam schedules

Will be jointly agreed on the first lecture

Evaluation methods and criteria

Exam: Clean room work 2 cr (40%)
Written Tabula-tasks (20%)
Project: Cleanliness of indoor air 2 cr (40%)

Teaching methods

classroom teaching
exercises
exam
independent e-learning
seminar

Learning materials

The material is in Tabula

Student workload

Mainly independent work.

Content scheduling

Course contents:
Cleanroom Work 3 cr
Cleanliness of indoor air 2 cr
----------
Contact lectures:
16.1., 13.2., 11.3., 27.3
and 17.4

Completion alternatives

AHOT

Practical training and working life cooperation

Santen visit?
Sisäilmastoseminaari 03/11/2015

Further information

Learning objectives
The student knows the impact of human activity in clean room work
The student knows the principles of clean room work
The student is familiar with the requirements of GMP in aseptic production
Students will become familiar with the factors affecting indoor air
Method of Implementation:
Mainly virtual implementation.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The performance is mainly based on the course handout information. Source references, sources and discussion show clear shortcomings.
In project work, concise handling of the subject, deficiencies in references.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Some additional sources other than handouts have been used. Sources are marked and reflection can be found.
In project work, the subject has been handled well, references have been selected and used critically and the text contains some personal reflection

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

In addition to the course handout excellent variety of references have been used. The texts also show the writers' own analytical reflection.
In project work, handling of the subject is diverse and includes the writers' own analytical reflection.