International Art Collaborations 2 (10 op)

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

Student is able to work in international art scene as a professional level and gets an international network. Student is able to produce art projects within international student group. Student is capable to operate in different cultures and communicates fluently in social media. Student develops observing, analysing and critical thinking in international contemporary art scenes, creative collaboration, project management and export of the art works as well as representations.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

International Skype conferences, group discussions, individual work in international student group.
Google Drive will be the platform for our documents.

Oppimateriaalit

Blurb-books, ppt-presentations disussion material in Google Drive.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Mostly individual work with groups/teams.
On line partizipation in to Skype-conferences, group meetings, virtual platform in Google Drive and virtual collaboration with other students.

Sisällön jaksotus

Contact meetings usually at every second week,on Wednesdays from 1pm to 3pm.
Beginning from January 7th,1 pm.
A few days intensive demoperiods in Blurb - on demand books.

Kansainvälisyys

Joint course with international partner universities: Korea (CAU), Canada (OCADU) and Germany (BTK).

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Also called as a nickname "INTAC", this course is part of a international INTAC-touring exhibition concept. Following exhibitions or other activities take place year 2015 in Osaka Japan and Vienna Austria.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has a lot of absences and activity participating lectures, excercises or assignments is weak.
Student has not faliliarized him/her self into the subject of the course and is not able to apply his/her knowledge to practical work.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student is able to master the subject matter acceptable way.
Student has a lot of abcenses and general activity low.
Reached competencies are tentative and student has difficulties to apply his/her knowledge to practical work.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Student is able to master the subject matter well.
Student has some abcenses but general activity good.
Reached competencies are in good level and student is able to apply his/her knowledge to practical work.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Activity in full filling the teaching tasks is excellent and student is able to master the subject matter well.
Reached competencies are in outstanding level and student is able to apply his/her knowledge to practical work and can innovate both new approaches and their applications in cultural field.