Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Writing Scientific Reports in English (3 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: 5E00BF83-3002

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika
02.07.2014 - 29.08.2014
Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on päättynyt.
Ajoitus
25.08.2014 - 01.12.2014
Toteutus on päättynyt.
Laajuus
3 op
Virtuaaliosuus
1 op
Toteutustapa
Monimuoto-opetus
Yksikkö
Environmental Engineering
Toimipiste
TAMK Pääkampus
Opetuskielet
englanti
Paikat
30 - 35
Koulutus
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
Opettajat
Ann Seppänen
Emmanuel Abruquah
Pienryhmät
Group 1 (Koko: 0 . Avoin AMK : 0.)
Group 2 (Koko: 0 . Avoin AMK : 0.)
Pienryhmät
Group 1
Group 2
Opintojakso
5E00BF83

Osaamistavoitteet (Opintojakso)

After completing the course students have achieved the following skills:
- Realistic evaluation of one’s own language (English) learning skills
- Accessing information from a wide range of sources
- Critical evaluation of information
- Competence in scientific reporting

Sisältö (Opintojakso)

The students will practice producing reports which are logically structured, cover sufficient and relevant content, include appropriately labelled graphics, follow the norms for referencing and lay-out, and are written in clear and accurate English.
The students will develop their skills in summarising, paraphrasing and synthesise source materials.

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

No exam.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

The grade for the course will be based on written reports produced for other compulsory first-year courses on the Environmental Engineering degree programme. The student thus gets credit in different courses for the same work.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

writing exercises
practice of specific writing skills
writing assignments

Oppimateriaalit

Materials will be supplied in class and posted in Tabula.
The teachers from all the courses concerned will contribute relevant materials for this course.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The class will be divided into two groups, and each group will have a 3-hour class once a week.
Full and active participation in class work is essential for students hoping to get a good grade.
Students will prepare themselves in advance for forthcoming classroom activities, and do follow-up assignments as set. Much of the writing will be done independently in unsupervised sessions.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

None.
Students wishing to get accreditation for this course must start the process at the beginning of the course at the latest; they must participate fully in the course until a decision is made about their accreditation eligibility.

Kansainvälisyys

Exchange students can join the course if they are ALSO participating in the courses with which this course is linked.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

This course is run in collaboration with other compulsory first-year Environmental Engineering courses for which written reports have to be produced (e.g. Soil Science, Chemistry). Because this course is run in co-operation with teachers of other courses, it is very important for students to keep to the planned schedule.
The students will practice writing reports which are logically structured, cover sufficient and relevant content, include appropriately labelled graphics, follow the norms for referencing and lay-out, and are written in clear and accurate English.
Students wishing to get accreditation for this course must start the process at the beginning of the course at the latest; they must participate fully in the course until a decision is made about their accreditations eligibility.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

One or more of the reports submitted for credit fail to meet specified criteria.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included. Requirements regarding participation, meeting deadlines etc. are minimally fulfilled.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Students’ English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are incorporated consistently; source materials are adequately paraphrased. Requirements regarding participation, meeting deadlines etc. are fulfilled.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

Students’ written English is formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are incorporated accurately and in a variety of ways; source materials are expertly paraphrased. Requirements regarding participation, meeting deadlines etc. are consistently fulfilled.

Siirry alkuun