LEANLaajuus (5 op)
Tunnus: NY00EH17
Laajuus
5 op
Osaamistavoitteet
- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks
Sisältö
- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)
The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)
The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.
Ilmoittautumisaika
05.06.2024 - 01.11.2024
Ajoitus
19.09.2024 - 20.12.2024
Laajuus
5 op
Virtuaaliosuus
5 op
Toteutustapa
Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu
Toimipiste
TAMK Pääkampus
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Paikat
20 - 60
Opettaja
- Mika Moisio
Vastuuhenkilö
Mika Moisio
Ryhmät
-
24YAMKYlempi AMK, yhteiset opinnot
Tavoitteet (OJ)
- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks
Sisältö (OJ)
- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)
The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)
The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)
Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.
Arviointiasteikko
0-5
Ilmoittautumisaika
15.08.2023 - 13.09.2023
Ajoitus
14.09.2023 - 15.12.2023
Laajuus
5 op
Virtuaaliosuus
5 op
Toteutustapa
Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu
Toimipiste
TAMK Pääkampus
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Paikat
0 - 60
Opettaja
- Mika Moisio
Vastuuhenkilö
Mika Moisio
Ryhmät
-
23YAMKYlempi amk, yhteiset opinnot
Tavoitteet (OJ)
- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks
Sisältö (OJ)
- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)
The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)
The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)
Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.
Arviointiasteikko
0-5
Ilmoittautumisaika
01.01.2022 - 11.09.2022
Ajoitus
12.09.2022 - 18.12.2022
Laajuus
5 op
Virtuaaliosuus
4 op
Toteutustapa
20 % Lähiopetus, 80 % Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu
Opetuskielet
- Englanti
Paikat
0 - 40
Opettaja
- Mika Moisio
Ryhmät
-
22YAMKYlempi amk, yhteiset opinnot
Tavoitteet (OJ)
- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks
Sisältö (OJ)
- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)
The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.
Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)
The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.
Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)
Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.
Arviointiasteikko
0-5