Siirry suoraan sisältöön

LEANLaajuus (5 op)

Tunnus: NY00EH17

Laajuus

5 op

Osaamistavoitteet

- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks

Sisältö

- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.

Ilmoittautumisaika

05.06.2024 - 01.11.2024

Ajoitus

19.09.2024 - 14.12.2024

Laajuus

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

5 op

Toteutustapa

Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu

Toimipiste

TAMK Pääkampus

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

20 - 60

Opettaja
  • Mika Moisio
Vastuuhenkilö

Mika Moisio

Ryhmät
  • 24YAMK
    Ylempi AMK, yhteiset opinnot

Tavoitteet (OJ)

- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks

Sisältö (OJ)

- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Ilmoittautumisaika

15.08.2023 - 13.09.2023

Ajoitus

14.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

Laajuus

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

5 op

Toteutustapa

Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu

Toimipiste

TAMK Pääkampus

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

0 - 60

Opettaja
  • Mika Moisio
Vastuuhenkilö

Mika Moisio

Ryhmät
  • 23YAMK
    Ylempi amk, yhteiset opinnot

Tavoitteet (OJ)

- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks

Sisältö (OJ)

- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Ilmoittautumisaika

01.01.2022 - 11.09.2022

Ajoitus

12.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

Laajuus

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

4 op

Toteutustapa

20 % Lähiopetus, 80 % Verkossa tapahtuva opiskelu

Opetuskielet
  • Englanti
Paikat

0 - 40

Opettaja
  • Mika Moisio
Ryhmät
  • 22YAMK
    Ylempi amk, yhteiset opinnot

Tavoitteet (OJ)

- To identify the customer needs and translate of the lean improvements into quality parameters
- To study, test and quantitatively assess the impact of different LEAN improvement options
- To apply and pilot the DMAIC cycle in your work or projects
- To investigate and manage process deviations and to evaluate lean project risks

Sisältö (OJ)

- recognize and apply LEAN practices and methods in your work or projects
- plan for LEAN transfer and tests
- make LEAN tests
- complete a final LEAN project plan for piloting lean in your work or projects
- assess the impact of LEAN

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

The submission fails to address the assignment. The submission does not consider other alternatives.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate solutions. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation. The solution identifies the cause of the problem.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5