Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet (OJ)

After completing this course the participants have updated their knowledge of recent developments in the field. The participants have applied what you have learnt on other courses to develop and analyse the value chain of a product, process or service. They are able to recognize the economical possibilities and risks in circular economy.

Sisältö (OJ)

Value chain. Economical possibilities and risks. Factors leading to truly circular economy.

Aika ja paikka

4.4.-5.6.2021

Tenttien ja uusintatenttien ajankohdat

No exam.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Assessment is based on 5 learning assignments.

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Joint kick-off at the beginning of the course (5th of April), independent learning through virtual learning assignments, peer evaluation and self-evaluation.

Oppimateriaalit

All learning materials are distributed via the Tuni Moodle. The student is strongly recommended to find complementary learning material and also share it with the others.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

5 x 27h = 135h. Asynchronous implementation allows personal study schedule. The student is expected to do an individual study plan for the course in order to be able to complete the course within the time frame.

Sisällön jaksotus

Five themes plus self-evaluation. Themes are opened to students weekly from the start. More information in the kick-off session.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

There are no alternative ways to complete the course.

Harjoittelu- ja työelämäyhteistyö

The student is encouraged to bring working life and personal experience in all its forms to be shared with others. Two business examples provided by visiting lecture recordings.

Kansainvälisyys

International study group.

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has not completed the assignments in accordance with the guidelines given.

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the assignments, but the scope and discussion concerning the topic is narrow and superficial. The participation in web discussions is partial and not constructive.

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the assignments and has taken into account multiple points of view on the issues showing awareness of their inter-connections. In web discussions, the student has shown openness to the ideas expressed by the other participants, can receive and give constructive feedback and has contributed at least on the minimum requirement level.

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

The student has completed the tasks with obvious dedication. The student has discussed the cases analytically and constructively both in individual assignments and group discussions. The student has shown active interest and engagement throughout the course. The student uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community.