Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet (OJ)

Student is able to:
- Use up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- Utilise new research directions in the field of 3D
- Apply different 3D-techniques in real life projects

Sisältö (OJ)

- Up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- New research directions in the field of 3D
- 3D-techniques in real life projects

Esitietovaatimukset (OJ)

Basics of 3D modeling.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Aika ja paikka

Zoom

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Evaluation of the independent assignments during the course (no additional exam or course work project)

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Online lectures and independent assignments

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

27h x 5cr = 135h

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Tavoitteet (OJ)

Student is able to:
- Use up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- Utilise new research directions in the field of 3D
- Apply different 3D-techniques in real life projects

Sisältö (OJ)

- Up to date 3D-techniques, tools and working methods
- New research directions in the field of 3D
- 3D-techniques in real life projects

Esitietovaatimukset (OJ)

Basics of 3D modeling.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5) (OJ)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Aika ja paikka

Zoom

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Evaluation of the independent assignments during the course (no additional exam or course work project)

Arviointiasteikko

0-5

Opiskelumuodot ja opetusmenetelmät

Online lectures and independent assignments

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

27h x 5cr = 135h

Arviointikriteerit - hylätty (0) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

not approved; less than half of the required work performed; clear misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - tyydyttävä (1-2) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Arviointikriteerit - hyvä (3-4) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Arviointikriteerit - kiitettävä (5) (Ei käytössä, kts Opintojakson Arviointikriteerit ylempänä)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).