Skip to main content

Web/App Design Project 1 (5 cr)

Code: IM00DS96-3004

General information


Enrolment period
01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
07.01.2023 - 22.05.2023
Implementation has ended.
Credits
5 cr
Virtual portion
4 cr
RDI portion
4 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
English
Seats
15 - 25
Degree programmes
Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
Antti Perälä
Christopher Smith
Kirsi Karimäki
Person in charge
Antti Perälä
Tags
BLENDED
Course
IM00DS96

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to

- implement a web or app design production project
- analyse their know how, used production techniques and outcomes
- collaborate in an international student team
- pay attention to the needs of customers and network
- utilize possibilities of sustainable production methods.

Content (course unit)

- Planning and implementing an individual or collaborative production project
- Producing a real life production work using resources available
- Networking

Prerequisites (course unit)

Basics of the subject.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

Starts on 5.2. 9-12 @ 20013
Zoom

Assessment methods and criteria

Course work project + student activity

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Independent work with teachers coaching

Learning materials

Digital resources

Student workload

5 x 27 h for each project

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Go back to top of page