Web and App Programming (5 cr)
Code: IM00DS94-3004
General information
- Enrolment period
- 01.12.2022 - 15.01.2023
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 07.01.2023 - 10.04.2023
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 5 cr
- Virtual portion
- 4 cr
- RDI portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Blended learning
- Unit
- Media and Arts
- Campus
- TAMK Mediapolis
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 15 - 25
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Objectives (course unit)
The student is able to:
- apply client-side programming and rich web interfaces to create single page apps for desktop, mobile and tablet.
- use web APIs in dynamic web apps
Content (course unit)
Client-side web and app programming
Prerequisites (course unit)
Basics of the subject.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:
https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi
Location and time
Zoom
Assessment methods and criteria
Exam + student activity
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Online lectures and independent exercises
Learning materials
Digital resources
Student workload
5 x 27 h
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
3 = good; all tasks performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)
4 = very good; all tasks performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
5 = excellent; all tasks performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).