Study Guide

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to:

- use advanced front-end web and app design tools and techniques
- create visually effective and usable web and app user interfaces for different platforms.

Content (course unit)

Front-end design tools and techniques, visual web and app user interface design.

Prerequisites (course unit)

Basics of the subject.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

Starts on 11.1. 9-15 @ Zoom
11.1., 12.1. 18.1., 19.1., 20.1., 25.1., 27.1., 1.2., 3.2., 8.2., 14.3. 9-15 @ Zoom

Assessment methods and criteria

Course work project + student activity

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

online lessions and exrecises, assignments

Content scheduling

- responsive web design with Bootstrap and CSS Grid
- building your WordPress theme using Bootstrap or CSS Grid

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).