Architectural Attractions in TampereLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: 5B00FC51
Credits
2 op
Objectives
Student has visited the most important architectural attractions in Tampere. Student is able to compose a professional report of target visits and he or she can document the target as photographs, too.
Content
Independently performed study, submission by deadline.
List of targets is informed by the course schedule.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Enrolment period
09.04.2024 - 23.06.2024
Timing
09.05.2024 - 24.10.2024
Credits
0 - 2
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
50 % Contact teaching, 50 % Online learning
Unit
Construction Architect
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Architect
Teachers
- Elina Ritola
- Minna Nyström
Person in charge
Minna Nyström
Groups
-
22I800
-
20I800
-
23I800
-
21I800
Objectives (course unit)
Student has visited the most important architectural attractions in Tampere. Student is able to compose a professional report of target visits and he or she can document the target as photographs, too.
Content (course unit)
Independently performed study, submission by deadline.
List of targets is informed by the course schedule.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Location and time
Summer - autumn 2024
Exam schedules
No exam, evalution done according to report
Assessment methods and criteria
Evalution done according to the quality of the report and photos
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Self study
Learning materials
Written and virtual material about the targets of the course
Student workload
27 h / credit
Content scheduling
Student plans the course schedule indepently
Completion alternatives
No alternative ways
Practical training and working life cooperation
-
International connections
-
Further information
Course moodle provides additional information
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student hasn't submitted the report of the course or the quality is very poor.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Enrolment period
05.05.2023 - 01.09.2023
Timing
05.05.2023 - 22.10.2023
Credits
0 - 5
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Construction Architect
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Architect
Teachers
- Elina Ritola
- Minna Nyström
Person in charge
Minna Nyström
Groups
-
19I800
-
22I800
-
20I800
-
21I800
Objectives (course unit)
Student has visited the most important architectural attractions in Tampere. Student is able to compose a professional report of target visits and he or she can document the target as photographs, too.
Content (course unit)
Independently performed study, submission by deadline.
List of targets is informed by the course schedule.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Location and time
Summer - autumn 2023
Exam schedules
No exam, evalution done according to report
Assessment methods and criteria
Evalution done according to the quality of the report and photos
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Self study
Learning materials
Written and virtual material about the targets of the course
Student workload
27 h / credit
Content scheduling
Student plans the course schedule indepently
Completion alternatives
No alternative ways
Practical training and working life cooperation
-
International connections
-
Further information
Course moodle provides additional information
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student hasn't submitted the report of the course or the quality is very poor.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Enrolment period
09.03.2022 - 15.08.2022
Timing
04.04.2022 - 23.10.2022
Credits
3 - 5
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Construction Architect
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
- English
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Architect
Teachers
- Elina Ritola
- Minna Nyström
Person in charge
Minna Nyström
Groups
-
18I800
-
19I800
-
20I800
-
21I800
Objectives (course unit)
Student has visited the most important architectural attractions in Tampere. Student is able to compose a professional report of target visits and he or she can document the target as photographs, too.
Content (course unit)
Independently performed study, submission by deadline.
List of targets is informed by the course schedule.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.
Location and time
Summer - autumn 2021
Exam schedules
No exam, evalution done according to report
Assessment methods and criteria
Evalution done according to the quality of the report and photos
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Self study
Learning materials
Written and virtual material about the targets of the course
Student workload
27 h / credit
Content scheduling
Student plans the course schedule indepently
Completion alternatives
No alternative ways
Practical training and working life cooperation
-
International connections
Summer 2021 course in Finnish
Further information
Course moodle provides additional information
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student hasn't submitted the report of the course or the quality is very poor.