Sensory Evaluation of Food (2 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Opiskelija osaa selittää, mitä aistinvarainen arviointi merkitsee ja ja miten aistinvarainen menetelmä valitaan, toteutetaan ja miten tuloksia tulkitaan. Opiskelija osaa antaa esimerkkejä kohteista, missä käytetään ihmisen aisteja näytteen ominaisuuksien mittaamisessa ja miten tuloksia hyödynnetään.

Content (course unit)

Elintarvikkeiden aistinvaraisen arvioinnin teoriaa
Haju- ja makutestaus; teoriaa ja käytännön toteutus
Elintarvikkeen testaus ja raportointi

Prerequisites (course unit)

-

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam, through access to the limit of 50% max points, the report of descriptive analysis, tasks done if a returned at the agreed time.
Exam: will be agreed during the first meeting, including renewals.
30.10.2015, the resit day 01/19/2016 and 01/26/2016

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Lectures, testing (smell and taste tests), testing agreed food

Learning materials

Tabulan material standards, Course Book of: Tuorila, Parkkinen & Tolonen; The senses professional (ISBN 978-951-0-31938-3)

Content scheduling

The tests: 29.09. (Smell and taste) and 07/10/2015 (the agreed food)

Further information

Attendance required for: for the first time and the explanation coefficient and the actual tests, the test events.
Tentatively: 15-20 exam questions in advance -> asked these 4-6.
The first meeting will be agreed course of action.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student does not participate in testing, will not return the evaluation report and the tasks of the food. Exam rejected / not participating.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Students will restore tasks / leaflet incomplete and late, guided allowed replenishment to an acceptable level, the exam result was satisfactory.
Mandatory conditions in the presence OK.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Students participate in classes / tests and will be able to transfer theory to practical work. Requires the guidance, but survives mostly indipendently.Tasks and reports: Restore and their content varies, but the control reaches a good level and the exam results of the H-level.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student is actively involved in lessons, asking / will participate in discussions and written assignments reset / report in a timely manner. Task responses are well structured and student has dedicated to the topic.Exam is the result of a commendable standard. The student participates in the preparation of the tests and will be able to test the situation to help other students