Technology Project Management (5cr)
Code: 5J00GM98-3002
General information
- Enrolment period
- 02.11.2025 - 17.01.2026
- Registration for introductions has not started yet.
- Timing
- 08.01.2026 - 31.05.2026
- The implementation has not yet started.
- Credits
- 5 cr
- Unit
- MD in Technology Management
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
- Teachers
- Matti Kivimäki
- Person in charge
- Matti Kivimäki
- Groups
-
25YTJMaster's Degree Programme in Technology Management
- Tags
- CONTACT
- HYBRID
- Course
- 5J00GM98
Objectives (course unit)
Students are able to:
· plan the different phases of the technology project (according to PMBOK guidelines)
· utilize project management software (such as ProjectLibre) for planning and monitoring
· develop a comprehensive and realistic project plan
· determine the utilization of resources, scheduling, and cost
· predict the completion time and final costs
· adapt the project according to the requirements of technology, contractors, and suppliers
· respond promptly to changes in the project situation
Content (course unit)
The students are able to plan, implement and manage demanding projects. Required skills are reached when students can create realistic project plans to supervise, forecast the project and manage project change.
· project management achievements
· project management terminology
· organizing projects
· project management skill areas (according to Ipma)
· project benefits and goals
· project life cycle and work break down structure
· project schedule, resourcing and costing
· project risk management
· project cost management (earned value, pert chart and committed cost)
· good practices
· project portfolio management
· project models and project management development
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student is able to identify the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity. The student's project plan is incomplete. Various sections have not been done theoretically right. Schedule is static and becomes a mess with changes.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student is familiar with the main principles, basic concepts, and tools of project activity, and is able to justify and apply his / her learning. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student knows and understands broadly the main principles, basic concepts and tools of project activity. The student is able not only to justify and apply his / her learning, but also to critically evaluate his / her own solutions. The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.Students show also the methods used to supervise and forecast the project outcome. The project plan also accounts for the steering group and other groups.
Location and time
Conjoint face-to-face processing between participants takes place in class room according to syllabus. Peer-groups decide to themselves the place and time for the peer-group processing, during those weeks which has been agreed to. It is also possible for teacher and students to construct timetable during the course, if need occurs. In case of pandemy teaching will take place with the help of digital tools.
Exam schedules
An exam will be organised only upon joint agreement between responsible teacher and course attendants. Baseline is that no exam will be held on this course (instead peer-groups will provide jointly one portfolio - portfolio process will be explicitly explained in the beginning of the course).
Assessment methods and criteria
The course will be assessed based on a written peer group work (=portfolio). All the rehearsals during the course will affect on the course note if connected to portfolio and presented as part of it. Group size, reporting, modus operandi, all will be closer discussed on first classes. NOTICE! With a joint agreement between teacher and students any part of the course can become subject to modifications. The grading will take place by teacher reflecting the (through Urkund's / TURNITIN's plagiation prevention platform) delivered final portfolio against Bloom's taxonomy - depending which level the peer-group members have achieved with their portfolio, decides for the note. NOTICE! Peer-groups are entitled to fire such a member who, regardless of exhortations is unable to follow the guidelines, agreed upon by the peer-group internally. Such a (dismissed) member's note for the course will be zero (0).
The general evaluation criterias of TAMK are considered as well: https://www.tuni.fi/opiskelijanopas/kasikirja/tamk?search=arviointi&page=2198
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Processive learning, interactive discussions, rehearsals (written & oral). Can include also other type of activities
Learning materials
Teacher will define material to be used in the beginning of the course. During the entire course e-material will be provided and updated in cloud (/Moodle or equivalent platform). Each student is strongly encouraged on individual, preferably most focused, relevant data mining from any chosen source (dissertations / articles / magazines / literature / media / interviews / web) - the use of such sources will be further addressed and explained in the beginning of course.
Student workload
Course entity is thus planned that student's time usage equals at each time Tamk's preset requirement. Face-to-face occurring class room educational activities is only a part of the students' work load. Another part of student work is all the processing that takes via peer groups, e.g. in form of discussion, analytical processing of information and additionally continuos development of course report (=portfolio) throughout the course. Third part of students' work is individually performed data mining and principles of knowledge managing - each peer group are urged to agree on peer-group internal rules of conduct to be strictly followed during the entire course.
Content scheduling
Lectures & peergroup weeks take turns during entire course - however, changes to this may occur due to overlapping of excursions, Tamk-activities or other curriculum reasons. In such cases teacher usually informs peergroups by email or other, jointly agreed manner.
Completion alternatives
Should the group noting be rejected (;note = "0"), the peer group can re-edit their written report twice. After third hand-over of the report the entire course will be considered as failed, after which the entire course is to be taken anewly. Missing, single attendances can be substituted by participating any other later remittance on the same course. Out of a special reason a single student can equiponderate mangel on performance with an assignment individually agreed with responsible teacher. Baseline is however (taking notice of the networking-, interaction- and organisation skills) that this course will be carried out in form of a peer group work ONLY - this is to be understood as an emphasis towards individual responsibility acting as a productive member of an peer group.
Practical training and working life cooperation
No practical training is foreseen, but it is preferred that participants actively promote during the entire course their connections and understanding to comply with course outline. All the co-operative measures towards industrial, economic and business life such as direct contacts, interviews, data collecting or own work life practices are considered as additional value for course accomplishing.
Industrial & business cases are usually used as example.
International connections
It is preferred, that participants actively promote during the entire course their international connections and networking. Additionally can be agreed on separate arrangement for students to acquire special knowledge or information recarding international activities.
Further information
Entire course is strictly focused on peer group working, with help of which the presented substance will be reflected towards peer-group chosen portfolio goal. Used pedagogy is processive learning. As active mind setting as possible, parallelly working as a group, is worthwhile - there is a strong correlation between better grading and intensive group work. All the group member will receive equal note of the course. Each group defines their working rules, which team members are obliged to follow the entire duration of the course. Additionally, each group is entitled to expell any fellow teammate that is not honouring jointly established rules.