Design Project 2 (8 cr)
Code: 5B00FB04-3002
General information
Enrolment period
01.12.2021 - 17.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 29.04.2022
Credits
8 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Construction Architect
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Architect
Teachers
- Elina Ritola
- Minna Nyström-Järvinen
Person in charge
Minna Nyström-Järvinen
Groups
-
20I800
Objectives (course unit)
Students can design a BIM model of a one-family houses of architectonically high quality taking into consideration the environment and legislation as well as local regulations. Students can produce designs for one-family houses.
After completing the course, students know regulations and guidelines concerning one-family houses. Students can select appropriate construction materials and structures for one-family houses and take into consideration the space reservation for building services.
Students learn housing and building design, sizing and furnishing, as well as housing design legislation and local regulations.
Students can design according to room schedule a small scale public building in a design team. They can design using building information model application.
Content (course unit)
Architecture and history of residential and small scale buildings
Construction laws, decrees and regulations
Design drawings.
HPAC and energy solutions as regards architectural design
Location and time
According to schedule.
Exam schedules
Will be informed if needed
Assessment methods and criteria
Activity during the course. Compulsory 80 % attendance in teaching sessions. Mid- or final critic seminars compulsary. If student is not able to be present he must prove a very important reason for absence.
Self evaluation, teacher's oral evalution ja peer review in critic seminars.
Grade 0 - 5 according to student's skills. Delayed submission or missing mid submissions will lower the grade.
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Project based case study.
During the course students compose project work based on previous study project.
Desing competition.
Lectures, project seminars, critic seminars.
Learning materials
Announced during the course
Student workload
The scope of the course is 87 credits. Students' working load is approximately 27 hours per credit.
Content scheduling
Will be informed during the course.
Completion alternatives
No alternative ways
Practical training and working life cooperation
Possible visitor lecturers
International connections
International exchange teachers used if possible
Further information
Prerequisite: courses Basics of Architecture, Basics of Design Work, Design Project 1 and Area Design Project or adequete skills according to teachers estimation
Moodle environment Moodle will be used as material bank
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has lot of absences. Poor activity during lessons.
Student cannot figure the main ideas of design work or apply the design knowledge to practice. The entity shows that he has not really entered the course information at all.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has lot of absences. Poor activity during lessons.
Student has difficulties in figuring the main ideas of design work and applying the design knowledge to practice. Submissions show the poor design knowledge and lack of earlier learned issues.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has only few absences. He has been active and constructive during lessons. Working with assignments goes on consictently. Students figures the main ideas of design work and is able to apply learned issues to practice. He can explain the choices made in a professional way.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Student has been active and constructive during lessons. Students figures the main ideas of design work and is able to apply learned issues to practice in a creative and multiple way. He can explain the choices made in a professional way.