Development of Acute Nursing (5cr)

Objectives (course unit)

The Student
- can identify and assess development needs of acute nursing and master research and development
- is able to map national and international trends of acute nursing for evidence-based practice
- is capable of demanding problem solving and innovate new acute nursing methods
- can work as expert in multiprofessional acute nursing teams and networks in a responsible manner

Content (course unit)

- current national and international development needs and trends in acute nursing
- problem solving and innovation process
- teamwork and networking skills

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

The Student
- is able to consider the contents of his/her own expert area based on the knowledge being studied;
- is able to write an expert article in his/her own area of responsibility in the healthcare environment;
- is able to evaluate acute care work and articles in the team;
- is able to work as a member of a multiprofessional team and act as a peer reviewer.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply expertise in his/her field of expertise in changing health environments and is able to critically analyze the information and sources of his or her responsibility both verbally and as a written expert in the form of an opinion/article utilizing the evidence based knowledge he has acquired and assessing its suitability for solving the (clinical) acute care problem;
- is able to comprehensively and critically evaluate his/her own activities both in personal and team work;
- is able to identify their own areas of development based on their feedback and to act as peers to develop and encourage feedback;
- is able to identify, evaluate and make evidence-based conclusions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The student
- is able to apply his/her clinical expertise extensively in changing healthcare environments;
- is able to prepare, implement and evaluate an expert article relevant to the development of its field;
- is able to act as a clinical expert in evaluating and prioritizing treatment needs in its various areas of responsibility within its various networks;
- is able to apply and critically evaluate the basis of evidence-based activities, to identify and make evidence-based conclusions and to evaluate their suitability for solving (clinical) problems.

Location and time

Instructions for learning and team building at the first meeting.

Assessment methods and criteria

Essee yksilösuoritus; arviointi asteikolla 1-5 arviontikriteerien mukaan, painotus 1.5 kokonaisarvosanasta

Tiimityö ( 2-4 henkeä ) artikkeliaihion kirjoittamiseen TAMK JOURNALin ohjeiden mukaan; arviointi 1-5 arviointikriteerien mukaan ohjauksen käyttö mukaan lukien, painotus 3.5 kokonaisarvosanasta.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Englanniksi
Contact teaching
Independent work
Teamwork (4 people) Article idea writing
Essay writing individual
Peer review
Simulation practising in Savonia AMK Kuopio

Learning materials

National and international publications and studies in the field and field of expertise. Professional journals

Student workload

5 op = 5 x 27 h = 135 h, joista yksilösuoritus essee 1 op. Esseen pituus max 9000 merkkiä välilyönteineen.

Tiimeissä 2-4 opiskelijan kahden opintopisteen panos 4 op sisältäen toisen tiimin tuotoksen vertaisarvioinnin ja seminaarin 26.11.2020.

Content scheduling

Esseen palautus 30.10 .2020 ( yhteinen ohjaus 21.10 klo 8.30-10 opiskelijoiden ennakko- kysymysten pohjalta.

Artikkeli-aihion 1 versio palautetaan lokakuun aikana opettajalle kommentoitia varten ja mahdolliset korjaukset tulee tehdä ennen viimeisen version palauttamista.

Valmis artikkeli-aihio palautetaan 13.11.2020

Completion alternatives

Ei ole

Further information

Tiimien ohjaus etäohjauksessa. Aikavaraukset ( ja niihin liittyvä materiaalin palautus) tulee tehdä ohjaavalle opettajalle sähköpostilla viikkoa ennen haluttua ohjausaikaa.