Research and Development (4cr)
Code: 5O00CV31-3001
General information
- Enrolment period
- 02.07.2018 - 12.09.2018
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 11.09.2018 - 07.12.2018
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 4 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Laboratory Engineering
- Campus
- TAMK Main Campus
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Laboratory Engineering
- Teachers
- Tuuli Välineva
- Petri Tuohimäki
- Joonas Koivumaa
- Laboratoriotekniikka Virtuaalihenkilö
- Person in charge
- Eeva-Leena Tuominen
- Course
- 5O00CV31
Objectives (course unit)
Student
o knows the research process and understands the significance of research for the development of working practices
o can plan an experimental research study
o knows the procedure of the thesis process at TAMK and requirements of a thesis
o knows the processes of searching information and is able to evaluate information critically.
o understands the importance of productization and commercialization in development of products and services
o knows the basic principles of innovation, and tools and methods of innovating products and services
Content (course unit)
• phases of scientific problem solving and the research process
• research ethics
• reporting, scientific publications
• critical evaluation/analysis of research
• basic concepts of product development and commercialization
• innovation tools
• innovation project
Exam schedules
no exams
Assessment methods and criteria
Research module: grading 0-5, 50% of the final grade
-research plan pass-fail
-thesis analysis 0-5
Product development module: grading 0-5, 50% of the final grade
-process evaluation
-team work evaluation
-outcome evaluation
Abstract workshop (pass/fail)
Information searching (pass/fail)
100% attendance required.
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
lectures
presentations
exercises
contact lessons
workshops
project work in groups
Learning materials
Material in Tabula
Student workload
43 h contact, 65 h independent and group work
Completion alternatives
-
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Hyväksytyn kriteerit eivät täyty.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student knows the research process with its stages and is able to analyze the quality and reliability of research. The student's written output corresponds to the TAMK's reporting guidelines and the satisfactory level of the thesis.
The student is partly familiar with the tools and basic principles of innovation
The student is able to recognize and develop product and service concepts.
The student makes, reports, and submits tasks according to the instructions.
The participation in group work is relatively poor.
The student's own contribution to the group's activities is small.
The use of references contains obvious shortcomings.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student is able to master the research process with its stages and is able to analyze the themes of research in versatile ways. The student's written output corresponds to the TAMK's reporting guidelines and the good level of the thesis.
The student is familiar with the tools and basic principles of innovation
The student is able to analyze and develop realistic product and service concepts.
The student makes, reports, and submits tasks clearly and in versatile way.
The student is able to use his own experience as well as literature as a source.
The student participates actively in work.
The student's own contribution to the group's activities is moderate.
The student uses references accordingly.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student is able to master the research process with its stages and is able to independently analyze the themes of research in versatile ways. The student's written output corresponds to the TAMK's reporting guidelines and the commendable level of the thesis.
The student is excellently familiar with the tools and basic principles of innovation
The student is able to analyze, develop and evaluate critically realistic product and service concepts.
The student makes, reports, and submits tasks excellently.
The student is able to use his own experience as well as literature as a source.
The student demonstrate understanding of the subject.
The student participates very actively in work.
The student's own contribution to the group's activities is significant.
The use of references is versatile and of high quality.