Skip to main content

New SolutionsLaajuus (10 cr)

Code: 8T00DQ72

Credits

10 op

Objectives

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Enrolment period

11.11.2024 - 02.01.2025

Timing

10.01.2025 - 15.02.2025

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

10 op

Mode of delivery

Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Tuija Ylä-Viteli
  • Taija Karhe
Person in charge

Leena Mäkelä

Groups
  • 22MRESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Enrolment period

22.11.2023 - 07.01.2024

Timing

12.01.2024 - 22.02.2024

Credits

10 op

RDI portion

10 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

25 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Jaana Sahlsten
  • Taija Karhe
Person in charge

Leena Mäkelä

Groups
  • 21MRESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Enrolment period

22.11.2023 - 02.01.2024

Timing

08.01.2024 - 20.02.2024

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

4 op

Mode of delivery

60 % Contact teaching, 40 % Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

35 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Tuija Ylä-Viteli
  • Taija Karhe
Person in charge

Tuija Ylä-Viteli

Groups
  • 21RESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5

Enrolment period

02.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

Timing

12.01.2023 - 25.03.2023

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

3 op

RDI portion

7 op

Mode of delivery

70 % Contact teaching, 30 % Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
  • English
Seats

15 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Leila Kakko
  • Taija Karhe
Person in charge

Taija Karhe

Groups
  • 20MRESTO
  • 23KVRN1
    Exchange Students Hospitality Management S2023

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Location and time

Contact teaching

Spring contact sessions are:

12.01.2023 16.30 - 20.00
13.01.2023 08.00 - 16.00
14.01.2023 08.30 - 14.30

28.01.2023 08.30 - 14.30 TEAMS

23.02.2023 16.30 - 20.00
24.02.2023 08.00 - 16.00
25.02.2023 08.30 - 14.30

Assessment methods and criteria

Evaluation
- approved development task (team), (1-5), 5 ECTS, 50% of the entire study module
- self- and peer review, (1-5), 2 ECTS, 20% of the total study module
-exam (individual), (1-5), 3 ects, 30% of the total study module

Assessment scale

0-5

Learning materials

Literature (3 ects)
Literature package (instructions in Moodle)
Development (7 ects)

Materials according to the development task

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Enrolment period

02.12.2022 - 05.01.2023

Timing

09.01.2023 - 22.02.2023

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

90 % Contact teaching, 10 % Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

15 - 60

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Tuija Ylä-Viteli
  • Leila Kakko
Person in charge

Leila Kakko

Groups
  • 20RESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5

Enrolment period

16.11.2021 - 07.01.2022

Timing

10.01.2022 - 07.03.2022

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

7 op

RDI portion

7 op

Mode of delivery

30 % Contact teaching, 70 % Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

5 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Arja Luiro
  • Pietro Albanese
Person in charge

Arja Luiro

Groups
  • 19RESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5

Enrolment period

02.12.2021 - 31.12.2021

Timing

05.01.2022 - 17.03.2022

Credits

10 op

Virtual portion

10 op

RDI portion

8 op

Mode of delivery

Online learning

Unit

Hospitality Management

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages
  • Finnish
Seats

5 - 50

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Hospitality Management
Teachers
  • Mika Kylänen
  • Leila Kakko
Person in charge

Leila Kakko

Groups
  • 19MRESTO

Objectives (course unit)

Students are able
- to pay attention to the new and existing phenomena, trends, and weak signals in the field and society
- to seek new research data in the professional field and based on the research data to yield concrete ideas to develop the field of business

Content (course unit)

WHAT chances does the field of business offer?
WHY do development, innovation, and envisioning belong to the competence in the field, and what tools are needed for them?
HOW can I find and recognise my own career path?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Professional participation has not been active. There are shortcomings in the development work. New research data and articles have been scarcely utilised in the work. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has not fully internalized the issue. There is little self-reflection in the work. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is not proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Professional participation has been at a good level. The development work has been successful. The mission has been accomplished and the plans have been followed. New research data and articles have been utilised. The work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter. The development work has been presented to the whole group and implemented according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

The professional involvement has been commendable. The development work has been very successful. Clear and diverse handling of the matter and workable plans. New research data and articles have been utilised in a wide range of ways. To its credit, the work has been accompanied by one's own reflection. From the development work, it can be interpreted that the student has internalized the matter and mastered it. The development work has been properly presented to the whole group and carried out according to plan. The scope of the work is proportional to the resources of the course.

Assessment scale

0-5