Technical Report and The Bachelor's ThesisLaajuus (3 cr)
Code: T300DJ14
Credits
3 op
Objectives
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Further information
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Enrolment period
01.07.2024 - 02.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 29.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Annina Korpela
Person in charge
Annina Korpela
Groups
-
21I351
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2024 - 15.09.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Johanna Granlund
Person in charge
Johanna Granlund
Groups
-
21I371
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
0-5
Enrolment period
01.07.2024 - 15.09.2024
Timing
01.08.2024 - 22.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
21I311
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2024 - 15.09.2024
Timing
01.08.2024 - 22.11.2024
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
21I341
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 17.05.2024
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
21AI351
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2023 - 01.09.2023
Timing
01.09.2023 - 30.11.2023
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Johanna Granlund
Person in charge
Johanna Granlund
Groups
-
20I351
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
0-5
Enrolment period
01.07.2023 - 17.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 03.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
20I341
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2023 - 17.09.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 03.12.2023
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
20I341A
-
20I371
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2023 - 01.09.2023
Timing
01.08.2023 - 29.11.2023
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
TAMK Languages and Communication
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Johanna Granlund
Person in charge
Johanna Granlund
Groups
-
20I311
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
0-5
Enrolment period
01.07.2022 - 28.09.2022
Timing
01.08.2022 - 08.12.2022
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
19I311
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2022 - 18.09.2022
Timing
01.08.2022 - 02.12.2022
Credits
3 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Lotta Markkula
Person in charge
Lotta Markkula
Groups
-
19I341
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Enrolment period
01.07.2022 - 18.09.2022
Timing
01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Credits
3 op
Virtual portion
3 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Construction Engineering
Teachers
- Johanna Granlund
Person in charge
Johanna Granlund
Groups
-
19I351
Objectives (course unit)
Students can write a clear content based thesis with good Finnish language.
Content (course unit)
• structure and style of a large report (e.g. using sources, summarizing)
• reading Bachelor’s theses
• grammar
Further information (course unit)
No alternative form of completion.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 50% of the classes.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
The student communicates comprehensibly and matter-of-factly, imitating models and instructions. The student finds sources, although their use and referencing is minimal and against the instructions. The substantiation of the claims is completely absent or modest. The construction of the text is tentative, and there are points to be made in the form and style of the language.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)
The student communicates in a structured and perceptive manner in his presentations. The views expressed are justified, and the sources have been chosen appropriately, the sources have been marked in accordance with the instructions. The referencing fits naturally into the rest of the text. Essential information is conveyed clearly, and the texts are fairly error-free.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)
The student communicates convincingly in his presentations, justifying his views in a versatile manner. He uses sources in an evaluative and commenting manner. The essential information of the prepared texts is excellently structured and summarized. The language and style of the text is controlled, following the instructions and almost error-free.
Assessment scale
0-5