Architectural Attractions in Tampere (5 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Student has visited the most important architectural attractions in Tampere. Student is able to compose a professional report of target visits and he or she can document the target as photographs, too.

Content (course unit)

Independently performed study, submission by deadline.
List of targets is informed by the course schedule.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.

Location and time

Summer - autumn 2024

Exam schedules

No exam, evalution done according to report

Assessment methods and criteria

Evalution done according to the quality of the report and photos

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Self study

Learning materials

Written and virtual material about the targets of the course

Student workload

27 h / credit

Content scheduling

Student plans the course schedule indepently

Completion alternatives

No alternative ways

Practical training and working life cooperation

-

International connections

-

Further information

Course moodle provides additional information

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Student hasn't submitted the report of the course or the quality is very poor.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student knows and is able to define the basic terms and concepts about the targets.
The report is done but it may include some mistakes.
Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to define the basic terms, relations and concepts about the targets.
The report is done well.
Student considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Student has visited all the targets.
Student stuctures and is able to consider the targets as a part of city and independent entities. Also temporal layers and future visions have been taken into consideration.
The report is professional.
Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task.