Nursing Administration (2cr)

Objectives (course unit)

The student
-is able to understand the entirety of management;
-identifies the key interdisciplinary skills and knows how to act accordingly.

Content (course unit)

- strategic planning, implementation and evaluation
- quality, safety and effectiveness
- culture of work society
- critical thinking

Prerequisites (course unit)

30 ects of initial stage studies completed

Location and time

Orientaatioluento verkkokurssille 3.3.2020 klo 9.15. Tiimien muodostaminen, noin 3 henkilön tiimii. Läsnäolo pakollinen.

Assessment methods and criteria

Numerical and verbal evaluation of written assignments.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Hoitotyön johtaminen 2 op / Kokonaisuutena verkkokurssi.

Learning materials

Suositeltava kirja: Laaksonen, H. & Ollila, S. 2017. Lähijohtamisen perusteet terveydenhuollossa. Helsinki: Edita.
Muu kirjallisuus
Juuti & Vuorela . 2015. Johtaminen ja työyhteisön hyvinvointi. 5. uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Österberg, M. 2014. Henkilöstöasiantuntijan käsikirja. Helsingin seudun kauppakamari. Viro: Meedia Zone Oy.
Manka Marja-Liisa, Hakala Liisa, Nuutinen Sanna & Harju Riitta. Työn iloa ja imua –työhyvinvoinnin ratkaisuja pientyöpaikoille. Tampereen yliopisto: Tammerprint OY. (löytyy sähköisenä netistä)

Student workload

Hallinto + johtaminen 2 op 2 x 27

Content scheduling

Opintojakso alkaa maaliskuussa ja päättyy toukokuussa.

Completion alternatives

Not optional ways to do the course.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The individual tasks of the leadership and management have not been made or restored on time.
The student does not actively participate in the work of the team and does not make peer assessments.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Approved administrative tasks performed.
Participation in team work and peer review.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Approved tasks performed. Self-evaluation good and versatile. The discussion is based on written sources and the subject is examined in a variety of ways.
Participation in the team's work both in teamwork and in peer review actively present their own suggestions and opinions, while also reflecting on other ideas.
The timing is going to proceed systematically .

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Approved tasks performed. Self-evaluation good and versatile. The discussion is based on written sources and the subject is examined in a variety of ways. The subject comes with their in-depth reflection and innovative perspectives
Participation in the team's work both in teamwork and in peer review actively present their own suggestions and opinions, while also reflecting on other ideas.
A timeline is going to go systematically everywhere and is responsibly from the perspective of the whole team.