Skip to main content

Web and App Design (5 cr)

Code: IM00DS92-3005

General information


Enrolment period
01.12.2023 - 15.01.2024
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
10.01.2024 - 22.05.2024
Implementation has ended.
Credits
5 cr
Virtual portion
4 cr
RDI portion
1 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
English
Seats
15 - 25
Degree programmes
Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
Antti Perälä
Person in charge
Antti Perälä
Groups
23MEDIAART
Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Tags
BLENDED
Course
IM00DS92

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to:

- use advanced front-end web and app design tools and techniques
- create visually effective and usable web and app user interfaces for different platforms.

Content (course unit)

Front-end design tools and techniques, visual web and app user interface design.

Prerequisites (course unit)

Basics of the subject.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

Zoom

Assessment methods and criteria

Course work project + student activity

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

online lessons and exercises, assignments

Content scheduling

- Responsive web design
- Basics of Wordpress
- Developing custom Wordpress themes
- Developing custom Wordpress applications

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

0 = not approved; less than half of the required work performed; clear misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Go back to top of page