Architectural Sites in Finland (5 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Student will expand his understanding about Finnish architecture and history by getting acquaited with architectural sites in Finland.
He will study the material about the architectural site beforehand, visit the site and make documentation about the result. Student will learn to make critical observations about built environment and consider the meaning of architectural site in larger context.
The documentation is done by using the official university template.

Prerequisites (course unit)

Minimun one year study of architecture

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Raportissa on paljon suoraan lainattua tekstiä ja se täyttää minimivaatimukset. Raportointitekniikkaan liittyen paljon virheellistä toimintatapaa tai huolimattomuutta. Kaikissa kohteissa on kuitenkin vierailtu.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Raportissa on vähän suoraan lainattua tekstiä ja se ylittää minimivaatimukset. Raportointitekniikkaan liittyen on vähän virheellistä toimintatapaa tai huolimattomuutta. Kaikissa kohteissa on vierailtu ja pohdittu kohteiden merkitystä ammattimaisesti.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Raportissa on äärimmäisen vähän suoraan lainattua tekstiä ja paljon omaa, ansiokasta pohdintaa. Raportointitekniikka on lähes virheetöntä ja koko raportti on työstetty erittäin huolellisesti. Kaikissa kohteissa on vierailtu, otettu korkeatasoisia valokuvia ja pohdittu kohteiden merkitystä ammattimaisesti sekä persoonallisesti.

Assessment criteria, pass/fail (course unit)

Minimivaatimukset esitetty tehtävänannossa.

Location and time

During year 2023

Exam schedules

No exam

Assessment methods and criteria

The report will be evaluated and it will be filtered through turnit plagiarism prevention program.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Independently performed course

Learning materials

Written material found concerning architectural sites

Student workload

27 hours per credit, one site => 0,5 credits

Content scheduling

-

Completion alternatives

-

Practical training and working life cooperation

-

International connections

Suitable for exchange students

Further information

Student should follow university instructions concerning report making

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The report contains a lot of directly quoted text but it meets the minimum requirements. A lot of incorrectness or carelessness regarding the reporting technique. The most of pictures borrowed from other sources and only a few taken by oneself. However, all sites have been visited.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The report contains only some directly quoted text and exceeds the minimum requirements. There is only few malpractice or carelessness regarding the reporting technique. All sites have been visited and the significance of the sites has been considered professionally. With a few exceptions, the pictures are taken by oneself.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The report contains extremely little directly quoted text and a lot of own, meritorious reflection. The reporting technology is almost flawless and the entire report has been worked on very carefully. All sites have been visited, high-quality photos have been taken and the significance of the sites has been considered professionally and personally. With a few exceptions, the pictures are taken by oneself.