Project Planning (5 cr)
Code: 5S00DZ46-3001
General information
Enrolment period
02.12.2022 - 13.01.2023
Timing
02.01.2023 - 28.04.2023
Credits
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering
Teachers
- Mika Ijas
- Mikko Ukonaho
- Petri Pohjola
- Antti Välimäki
- Tomi Salo
- Klaus Virtanen
Person in charge
Jarkko Lehtonen
Groups
-
20I228S
-
20I228T
-
20I228K
-
20I228A
Objectives (course unit)
The students are able to carry out technical designs in their field, choose between various technical options and produce the materials required for implementing and documenting the project. The students can use design software, standards, design protocols and to work as members of a team. They understand the significance of project management, division of labor and scheduling as a part of goal-oriented project work.
Content (course unit)
The planning follows the initiation stage. Typically the planning begins with creating various solutions and choosing the best one to implement. Design tasks are divided into sections: machine design, electric design and automation design. It is important for the group to work together so that every member of the group knows what the others are doing and are able to comment on each others’ work. The work is documented into the learning diary.
The results of the planning phase are drawings and other documentation which enable acquisitions and implementation of the project.
Prerequisites (course unit)
5S00BU71 ja 5S00BU72
Assessment methods and criteria
Reports, portfolios, project results, demonstrations, discussions, peer reviews and evaluations, seminar quality and participation
Assessment scale
0-5
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the proje
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student recognizes the different areas of the project and the roles of the people involved in the project. The student knows the technical entities and grouping required by the definition. The student is supported in project planning, scheduling and project management. The student is aware of the need for information retrieval.
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student knows well the functions related to the project work and performs the tasks independently. The student is able to bring knowledge and skills to his / her own area of expertise to advance the project. The student is able to work well in the group and in the given schedule. Students are able to communicate well in writing and orally, Student can independently search for missing information from different sources.
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
The student is well versed in all aspects of the project and is able to apply their skills to advance the project. The student is able to take responsibility for the management of the project and is active in helping the others in the group. The student is able to communicate in writing and orally fluently, The student is searching for information widely and is able to evaluate its correctness, and is able to make excellent summaries of them.