Skip to main content

Social Media in Communication and Community Building (5 cr)

Code: SO00DU36-3002

General information


Enrolment period
25.05.2023 - 07.10.2023
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
03.10.2023 - 20.12.2023
Implementation has ended.
Credits
5 cr
Virtual portion
5 cr
RDI portion
1 cr
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
Media and Arts
Campus
TAMK Mediapolis
Teaching languages
English
Seats
15 - 30
Degree programmes
Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts
Teachers
Antti Perälä
Person in charge
Antti Perälä
Tags
ONLINE
Course
SO00DU36

Objectives (course unit)

The student knows how to use social networking, blog publishing, microblogging services to broadcast and to communicate with targeted audiences. (S)he is also able to establish and moderate online discussion groups and wikis for knowledge and community building.

Content (course unit)

Individual and team work with free online social media services and collaborative tools.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

The contact lessons are on Tuesday evenings in Zoom: https://tuni.zoom.us/j/67352072680

Assessment methods and criteria

Course Work Project

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Online lectures and independent work

Learning materials

Digital resources

Student workload

27h x 5 cr = 135 h

Practical training and working life cooperation

The course work project can be done for a real company,

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good;  attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance;  a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Go back to top of page