Skip to main content

Working English for Engineers (3 cr)

Code: 5N00EK81-3036

General information


Enrolment period

09.09.2022 - 24.10.2022

Timing

24.10.2022 - 16.12.2022

Credits

3 op

Virtual portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

67 % Contact teaching, 33 % Distance learning

Unit

TAMK Languages and Communication

Campus

TAMK Main Campus

Teaching languages

  • Finnish
  • English

Seats

10 - 45

Degree programmes

  • Degree Programme in Vehicle Engineering

Teachers

  • Riku-Matti Kinnunen

Person in charge

Riku-Matti Kinnunen

Groups

  • 22AUTOA

Objectives (course unit)

Students
- know how to act in working life communication situations (e.g. telephone and e-mail communication)
- know the basic business terminology and can give a presentation of a chosen company
- know the most important vocabulary of their field of study

Content (course unit)

• working life communication situations
• business life English
• terminology of the students’ own field of study
• grammar as required

Prerequisites (course unit)

Basic language studies in English completed or equivalent skills

Further information (course unit)

Approved skills test or corresponding course at another university of applied sciences.
Sufficient skills in Finnish.
Mandatory participation on 80% of the classes.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

Student
• copes with simple conversational situations, also related to companies in his field
• reacts to what the interlocutor says most often in a comprehensible manner
• is aware, to some extent, of the style requirements set by different types of texts
• writes clearly in outline
• understands the main points of normal-paced speech in a familiar context, when the message is repeated if necessary
• pronounces intelligibly most of the time
• finds the information the student is looking for in texts that deal with familiar topics
• uses the basic vocabulary of the field so that the essential message is conveyed
• uses simple basic grammar structures
• uses available aids, e.g. online dictionaries

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

Student
• discusses both general topics and topics related to his field and its companies quite fluently
• reacts to what his interlocutor says mostly appropriately
• mostly communicates in the style required by the situation
• writes fairly fluently and clearly
• understands people speaking with different accents when the topic is familiar
• pronounces quite naturally and clearly
• understands the main points and most details of the text read
• can, if necessary, express the matter in other words
• understands and uses the vocabulary of the field quite accurately
• knows how to use different sources and dictionaries
• uses structures mostly correctly and corrects mistakes in language if they have led to misunderstandings

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

Student
• fluently discusses both general topics and topics related to his professional field and its companies
• reacts quickly and appropriately to what the interlocutor says
• communicates in the style required by the situation
• writes fluently and appropriately with almost no grammatical errors
• understands relatively easily also people who speak with different accents
• pronounces naturally and clearly
• understands both the main points and the details of a demanding professional text and is able to apply what he has read
• explains in other words and makes up for gaps in vocabulary discreetly
• understands and uses skillfully and precisely the vocabulary of the field as well as the terminology of the student's own specialty
• usually finds different sources using appropriate words and expressions
• uses versatile grammatical structures and manages them almost flawlessly

Location and time

See the Moodle platform of this course for the detailed information of the time and place for meetings, and the meeting-specific programme.

Exam schedules

The exams will be held on the last lecture day or at Exam.

Assessment methods and criteria

- Continuous assessment. The student collects points for completing and submitting an assignment on time. Quality of work and language are taken into consideration.
- Test at the end of the course.
- Self-evaluation

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Classroom teaching and lectures, independent work, group work and oral presentations in pairs or small groups.

Learning materials

Materials will be available on TUNI Moodle in addition to student-created materials.

Student workload

The student uses time in attending classroom meetings, creating self-study and group assignments.

Content scheduling

Business vocabulary and expressions
Email writing
Oral company presentation in pairs or small groups

Completion alternatives

An equivalent course of university level or work experience.

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

-The student has attained less than 80% of attendance.
- The student has not submitted the assignments on the course by the due-date.

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student has attended, at least 80% of the classes and has completed and submitted all the assignments.
- his written skills are readable and comprehensible but vocabulary choice is limited and there are major errors in grammar
- his oral skills are understandable but the pronunciation of keywords needs improvement.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student has attended, at least 80% of the classes and has completed and submitted all the assignments.
- his written skills are readable and comprehensible with no limitations in vocabulary choice and there are no major errors in grammar
- his oral skills are understandable with clear pronunciation of keywords but with occasional lapses.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student has attended, at least 80% of the classes and has completed and submitted all the assignments.
- his written skills are readable and comprehensible with no limitations in vocabulary choice and there are no errors in grammar
- his oral skills are understandable with clear pronunciation of keywords.