Academic Writing Skills (2cr)
Code: 3E00EJ08-3004
General information
- Enrolment period
- 24.11.2021 - 15.05.2022
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 2 cr
- Virtual portion
- 2 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Online learning
- Unit
- Business and Media
- Campus
- TAMK Main Campus
- Teaching languages
- English
- Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Educational Leadership
Objectives (course unit)
After this course students can
-organize their text so that it is coherent and easy to follow
-apply the typical features of academic style and vocabulary in their own thesis
-analyze the structure of academic texts to find topic sentences and transition words
-paraphrase and summarize their reading and use citations to justify their own argumentation
-write a logical and coherent thesis abstract
Content (course unit)
Structure and organization of texts
Academic language and style
Praphrasing ans summarizing
Literature review
Discussing Results
Thesis abstract
Prerequisites (course unit)
English at level B2
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)
PASS
The student's text is well-organized and coherent.
It is academic in style and vocabulary.
Their own voice is clear.
They use referencing to support and justify their own argumentation and findings.
They edit their text based on feedback and give constructive feedback to fellow students.
FAIL
The student's text is disorganized and difficult to follow.
It suffers from register clashes and poor structure.
The literature review is mainly a summary of other writers' ideas and texts.
Poor referencing technique doesn't make clear which is the student's voice, which is borrowed from somebody else.
The student doesn't utilize feedback and is not able to give constructive feedback.
Assessment criteria, pass/fail (course unit)
PASS
The student's text is well-organized and coherent.
It is academic in style and vocabulary.
Their own voice is clear.
They use referencing to support and justify their own argumentation and findings.
They edit their text based on feedback and give constructive feedback to fellow students.
FAIL
The student's text is disorganized and difficult to follow.
It suffers from register clashes and poor structure.
The literature review is mainly a summary of other writers' ideas and texts.
Poor referencing technique doesn't make clear which is the student's voice, which is borrowed from somebody else.
The student doesn't utilize feedback and is not able to give constructive feedback
Location and time
Available online for free access anytime
Assessment scale
Pass/Fail
Teaching methods
Self-study and peer feedback online
Learning materials
in Tabula
Content scheduling
Structure and organization of academic texts
Academic style and language
Literature review
Discussing your results
Writing your abstract
Completion alternatives
You can either do 1cr by completing the first three lessons, or 2 cr by completing all the lessons. You can also only use this course only a s knowledge resource without doing any of the tasks and not gaining any credits.
Further information
You can either do 1cr by completing the first three lessons, or 2 cr by completing all the lessons. You can also only use this course only a s knowledge resource without doing any of the tasks and not gaining any credits.
There is little facilitation on this course. Students give feedback to and support each other.
Assessment criteria - pass/fail (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Written tasks and giving feedback to peer students. ’Pass’ when all the tasks have been successfully completed including required feedback to peers.
The course has an activity tracking feature on in Moodle.