Introduction to Programming (3 cr)

Objectives (course unit)

Students knows basics of programming.

Content (course unit)

- Programming structures and program flow
- Types and variables
- Boolean logic
- Branches, loops

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, good (3-4) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment criteria, excellent (5) (course unit)

TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:

https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Location and time

This course is done fully online via Zoom-sessions. Here' s the Zoom link:

Join Zoom Meeting
https://tuni.zoom.us/j/67615820431?pwd=U3d4eDg1OWJCaTJqTkI5RG00UjQxZz09

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Zoom contact teaching and independent work

Learning materials

Online resources

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 h

Further information

During this course we will:

-Learn the important basic concepts of programming
-Understand the differences between various programming languages
-Get familiar with web-programming and learn to create basic web applications

Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

2 = satisfactory; more than half of the course tasks submitted; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student is able to deliver an unpolished product with basic functionality in the specified time frame.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student is able to deliver working product with useful functionality in the specified time frame.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student is able to deliver a polished product with great functionality in the specified time frame.