Enterprise Resource Planning (5cr)

Objectives (course unit)

This course covers the primary ideas of Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERP). The course focuses on SAP-system (integrated modules) from logistics point of view. It explores integration between the Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and Warehouse Management Systems (WMS). More information is available at www.logivo.fi.

After completing the course, students will be able to:

Define the business process model and ERP selection criterias.
Describe what enterprise resource planning (ERP) means.
Support ERP project implementations.
Navigate in SAP R/3 and Business One environment.
Work in details with the SAP AIO module (sales and distribution, Material Management,).
Act as a SAP user: Master data, material data.
Plan the first phases in SAP customizing.

Content (course unit)

Introduction to ERP systems
Navigation in SAP AIO
SAP AIO without WMS
SAP AIO with WMS in partnership with guest lecturer from Belgium
ERP implementation project as a cmpany based assignment
SAP customizing.

Prerequisites (course unit)

-The Basics of logistics is a prerequisite to this course

Location and time

accoording to study schedule see Peppi/Pakki for details (Lukkari)

Exam schedules

No exam

Assessment methods and criteria

- Assigment
The general evaluation criterias of TAMK are applied: https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Classroom learning,
Case learning,
Processive learning, interactive discussions
Independent stydy
Group studies

Learning materials

Course material in Tabula and relevant / articles / magazines / literature / media / interviews / web , more to be described in Tabula

Student workload

According to TAMK schedule and Tabula timing instructions
Contact lessons, independent study and group assignments

Content scheduling

details to be reviewed in 1st lesson (tbd in Tabula)

Completion alternatives

No alternative implementations

Practical training and working life cooperation

Project work / project case study

International connections

Cases and discussion

Further information

N.A

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student knows something from topic and is moderately able to interpret and apply the learned knowledge. The student is able moderately to describe what kind consequences to the company would have with each options. The student is motivated and take responsibility own work and gives moderate peer evaluation

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student knows well the topic and is able to interpret and apply the learned knowledge. The student is able to describe what kind consequences to the company would have with each options. The student is motivated and take responsibility own work and gives moderate peer evaluation. Everything is done in time and according to instructions.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

The student knows and understand widely the topic and is able widely to interpret and apply the learned knowledge. The student is well able to describe and justify what kind consequences to the company would have with each options. The student is highly motivated and take responsibility own work and gives good peer evaluation. Everything is done in time and according to instructions.