Physics Laboratories (3 cr)
Code: 5N00BG56-3005
General information
- Enrolment period
- 11.06.2018 - 02.09.2018
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 27.08.2018 - 14.12.2018
- Implementation has ended.
- Credits
- 3 cr
- Local portion
- 2 cr
- Virtual portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Blended learning
- Unit
- Environmental Engineering
- Campus
- TAMK Main Campus
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 0 - 33
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
Objectives (course unit)
After completing this course student can
- make controlled physical measurements
- evaluate reliability of measurements
- report measurements according to standards and ethical principles
- evaluate importance of measurements
- plan, implement and analyze an own measurement
Content (course unit)
Measurements of students own technical area
Reporting of laboraratory works
Project learning applications
Prerequisites (course unit)
Writing Scientific Reports in English, Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics and Thermophysics, Electrodynamics and Magnetism, Oscillation, Waves and Modern Physics
Exam schedules
No exams
Evaluation methods and criteria
Evaluation is based on the average of the grades of the laboratory works. Each report is evaluated based on the working in the laboratory, results and the report.
Participation to measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Assessment scale
0-5
Teaching methods
Contact teaching
Laboratory work
Report
Cooperative learning
Learning materials
Randall Knight, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education.
The weekly schedule and laboratory instructions available tabula.tamk.fi
Technical Formulas, Tammertekniikka, 2002
Student workload
- Introductions,feedbacks, guidance 23h
- Laboratory measurements 21 h
- Poster presentation 3h
- Independent work ab. 33h
Total ab. 80h
-
Content scheduling
Introduction, selfevaluation of a previous report 3h.
Calculation methods introduction,data processing 6h.
Laboratory exercises chosen from the fields of general and environmental physics 21 h.
Feedback, guidance 15h.
Poster presentations 3h.
Working: Measurements are done by working in pairs.
Lab 1 Grading: Need to get acceptable level
-common responsibility report of each pair required
Labs 2 - 5 Grading: 0...5
- 2 individual reports/person (meaning every second work for each student)
Lab 6 Own designed lab Grading 0...5
- Common poster, calculation sheet and presentation
Delivery times:
- 2 working weeks from the date of the measurements
- a delay will affect negatively on the grading
- the dead line is 4 working weeks from the date of measurements
Assessment criteria - fail (0) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Missing works or reports.
Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Participation to all measurement classes and presentattions is compulsory.
Reports have been done,methods and results have been presented, structure and analyses may have some shortages and can be partly erroneous.Discussion contains very few, simple conclusions.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Participation to all measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Measurements and reports done in a normal way. Results and analyses are correct.
Reports have been done correctly according to the reporting standards of TAMK. Discussion contains some comments relevant comments relating to the results and applications.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)
Participation to all measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Measurements and reports done with comprehensive, active, collaborative working. Results and analyses are correct. Structured, fluent, especially transparent text, vision of limitations and improvements, broad mature discussion and own conclusions related to the topics.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"