Skip to main content

Method Development and Validation (4 cr)

Code: 5O00CE78-3002

General information


Enrolment period
02.12.2017 - 07.01.2018
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.01.2018 - 04.03.2018
Implementation has ended.
Credits
4 cr
Local portion
4 cr
Mode of delivery
Contact learning
Unit
Laboratory Engineering
Campus
TAMK Main Campus
Teaching languages
Finnish
Degree programmes
Degree Programme in Laboratory Engineering
Teachers
Outi Heiniö
Piia Kanto
Person in charge
Eeva-Leena Tuominen
Course
5O00CE78

Objectives (course unit)

Student is able to
- evaluate the analysis method and develop it further
- plan the validation of an analysis method
- make validation measurements in practice
- evaluate results using statistical methods
- write validation report

Content (course unit)

- method development with the help of literature
- writing the validation plan and doing the measurements in practice
- statistical evaluation of the measurements including the uncertainty estimate for the analysis
- validation report

Location and time

Lukujärjestyksen mukaan

Exam schedules

Ei tenttiä

Evaluation methods and criteria

Kirjallisuushaun hallitseminen, menetelmän kehittäminen, laboratoriotyöskentely, menetelmän validointi laskutoimituksineen (tilastomatematiikka) arvioidaan.

Assessment scale

0-5

Teaching methods

Kirjallisuuden kartoitus itsenäisesti, menetelmän laatiminen ja testaus (tarvittaessa ohjatusti), testatun menetelmän validointi.

Learning materials

Alan kirjallisuus.

Content scheduling

Analyysomenetelmän laatiminen, menetelmän kehitys laboratoriossa ja kehitetyn menetelmän validointi.

Further information

Esitietovaatimuksina Laiteanalytiikka, Laiteanalytiikan laboratoriotyöt, Laboratorion laaatu ja tilastolliset menetelmät

Assessment criteria - satisfactory (1-2) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

Students are able to develop methods of analysis by using literature as an aid and guidance of the teacher. He knows how to make Validation of the method and perform validation under guidance.

Assessment criteria - good (3-4) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

In addition the student is able to develop the method independently. He is able to assess the reliability of analysis results and make independent method validation plan and method validation.

Assessment criteria - excellent (5) (Not in use, Look at the Assessment criteria above)

In addition the student is able to develop a method of analysis independently. They will be able to draw up a comprehensive validation and evaluate the results of the validation. He can also, if necessary, plan and take the necessary follow-up action.

Go back to top of page